[GitHub Request] Add @bugmakerrrrrr as maintainer of the OpenSearch repository

[andrross]

What is the type of request?

User Permission

Details of the request

See opensearch-project/OpenSearch#17466

@bugmakerrrrrr needs write access to the repository to be added as a maintainer

Additional information to support your request

The maintainers have voted per the nomination process and @bugmakerrrrrr has accepted the invitation to become a maintainer.

When does this request need to be completed?

ASAP

Notes

Track the progress of your request here: https://github.com/orgs/opensearch-project/projects/208/views/33.
Member of @opensearch-project/admin will take a look at the request soon.
Thanks!

[peterzhuamazon]

Hi @andrross could you list out the contributions from @bugmakerrrrrr?

And would you list out the maintainers that gives +1 in the nomination process?

Thanks.

[peternied]

@peterzhuamazon We don't publish the email threads for the nomination process, lets not start opening up those details as they are sensitive conversations. If there is issues with maintainers not following the project guidance, lets let them self-govern and bring it up with the foundation.

If you'd like to change the maintainer nomination and approval process, would you mind creating a PR on this repo?

[peterzhuamazon]

@peterzhuamazon We don't publish the email threads for the nomination process, lets not start opening up those details as they are sensitive conversations. If there is issues with maintainers not following the project guidance, lets let them self-govern and bring it up with the foundation.

If you'd like to change the maintainer nomination and approval process, would you mind creating a PR on this repo?

Hi, as stated above we are not trying to publish the email threads.

As part of the communications with LF on the request process.

We want to ensure that the voting process is well-established, transparent, and documented, as we need to work with LF on ticket for inviting new nominees to the org.

If there is any misunderstanding I apologize for the wording.

We are trying to improve the process so that OpenSearch Software Foundation is truly open and public in working with the communities on the matters.

Thanks.

[peternied]

We want to ensure that the voting process is well-established, transparent, and documented, as we need to work with LF on ticket for inviting new nominees to the org.

Thanks, this sounds pretty important as maybe there have been misses in the past. Could we get these requirements documented on the .github project, the current description doesn't include any oversight by LF.

---

The PR [1] has 5 approvals from OpenSearch maintainers, and here is a query [2] that shows 30 contributions by the nominated maintainer. Is that enough to move forward?

• [1] Add @bugmakerrrrrr as maintainerrrrrr OpenSearch#17466
• [2] https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pulls/bugmakerrrrrr

[peterzhuamazon]

A ticket has been created with LF here:

• https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-27860

Thanks.

[andrross]

I agree with @peternied's concerns here. The discussions on the nomination threads should remain private to the maintainers. I also don't want to establish a precedent of sharing which maintainers voted +1 as the decision to vote or abstain from voting should remain private.

The policy does say the content of the nomination should be included in the PR to add the new maintainer. I initially failed to include that but I have updated the PR, just so there's no doubt about all of bugmakerrrrrr's awesome contributions :)

[peterzhuamazon]

Hi @andrross @peternied ,

These are valid feedbacks and we will move forward with the updated PR above.

Thanks!

[peterzhuamazon]

Hi @bugmakerrrrrr an invite has been sent to you.
Could you accept and confirm here?

Thanks.