Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify author metadata check #1318

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

RMeli
Copy link
Contributor

@RMeli RMeli commented Mar 1, 2024

I asked the following on Slack:

Do the metadata on Zenodo need to match the paper exactly? Or the author list of the paper can be a subset of the authors on Zenodo?

and this PR changes the pre-publication steps according to the answers received.

My current understanding is that it is OK if the authors in the archive metadata don't match the authors on the paper as long as all the authors on the paper are included in the metadata (other contributors should be marked as such, if possible, instead of being marked as authors too).

docs/editing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -97,12 +97,17 @@ When a submission is ready to be accepted, we ask that the authors issue a new t
Optionally you can ask EditorialBot to generate a checklist with all the post-review steps running the command: `@editorialbot create post-review checklist`

Pre-publication steps:
- (Optional) Run `@editorialbot create post-review checklist`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a bit repetitive since it's written just above, but if someone goes too quickly to the list of steps, this suggestion can be easily missed.

docs/editing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/editing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@xuanxu xuanxu merged commit 945cf9d into main Mar 16, 2024
2 checks passed
@xuanxu xuanxu deleted the RMeli/clarify-author-metadata-check branch March 16, 2024 18:44
pdebuyl added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2024
In the recent PR #1318 which I missed for review, there is a typo.
@pdebuyl pdebuyl mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants