[PRE REVIEW]: GrIML: A Python package for investigating Greenland’s ice-marginal lakes under a changing climate

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @PennyHow (Penelope How)
Repository: https://github.com/GEUS-Glaciology-and-Climate/GrIML
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a2e10775df44b89f26b0ac9dbf8bc9e3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a2e10775df44b89f26b0ac9dbf8bc9e3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a2e10775df44b89f26b0ac9dbf8bc9e3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a2e10775df44b89f26b0ac9dbf8bc9e3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @PennyHow. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@PennyHow if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1017/jog.2022.20 is OK
- 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.07.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102876 is OK
- 10.5194/essd-13-741-2021 is OK
- 10.1038/s43247-024-01522-4 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-017-07960-9 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-021-83509-1 is OK
- 10.22008/FK2/MBKW9N is OK
- 10.1002/2017GL074081 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.12823307 is OK
- 10.7280/D1WT11 is OK
- 10.5194/tc-16-297-2022 is OK
- 10.1029/2020GL088865 is OK
- 10.1017/jog.2023.34 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Rasterio: geospatial raster I/O for Python program...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Greenland Ice Marginal Lake Inventory Series f...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Sentinel Hub

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099276 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- 10.5281/zenodo.394676 is INVALID

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.05 s (1547.1 files/s, 116437.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          41            618            588           2109
Markdown                        14            313              0            635
YAML                             5             14             18            244
TeX                              1             20              0            196
JavaScript                       2             59             62            189
DOS Batch                        2             16              2             52
TOML                             1              3              0             36
XML                              1              0              0             35
reStructuredText                 2             51             82             28
make                             2              8             14             18
Text                             1              0              0              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            72           1102            766           3551
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    59	PennyHow
    15	Penny How

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

⚠️ Wordcount for paper.md is 1378

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Integrated hydrologic model development and postprocessing for GSFLOW using pyGSFLOW
Submitting author: @jlarsen-usgs
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @thurber, @mdbartos, @mdbartos
Similarity score: 0.6719

Geodata-Harvester: A Python package to jumpstart geospatial data extraction and analysis
Submitting author: @sebhaan
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @lukasbeuster, @martibosch
Similarity score: 0.6717

GemGIS - Spatial Data Processing for Geomodeling
Submitting author: @AlexanderJuestel
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @omshinde, @kanishkan91
Similarity score: 0.6701

A Python Tool for Predicting and Assessing Unconventional Rare-Earth and Critical Mineral Resources
Submitting author: @justaPCWingo
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @jeinsle, @jameshgrn, @FrancescoPerrone
Similarity score: 0.6609

xclim: xarray-based climate data analytics
Submitting author: @Zeitsperre
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @kthyng
Similarity score: 0.6602

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[kthyng]

Hi @PennyHow and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

• OSI-approved license
• Installation instructions
• Documentation exists at all
• Tests of some sort
• Check paper (make sure compiles, read through, check for length 250-1000 words)
• Substantial scholarly effort
• Clear research application

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

[PennyHow]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Integrated hydrologic model development and postprocessing for GSFLOW using pyGSFLOW
Submitting author: @jlarsen-usgs
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @thurber, @mdbartos, @mdbartos
Similarity score: 0.7081

glottospace: R package for language mapping and geospatial analysis of linguistic and cultural data
Submitting author: @SietzeN
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @fauxneticien, @skalyan91
Similarity score: 0.7065

riversCentralAsia: An R package to support data pre- and postprocessing for hydrological modelling with RS MINERVE
Submitting author: @mabesa
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @mengqi-z, @tonyewong
Similarity score: 0.6997

GemGIS - Spatial Data Processing for Geomodeling
Submitting author: @AlexanderJuestel
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @omshinde, @kanishkan91
Similarity score: 0.6982

pypromice: A Python package for processing automated weather station data
Submitting author: @PennyHow
Handling editor: @observingClouds (Active)
Reviewers: @jroettenbacher, @simonrp84
Similarity score: 0.6929

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[PennyHow]

Hi @kthyng, I've just edited the DOIs and reduced the length of the paper (as I saw the word count was a little over the recommendation).

I have checked and think everything else fits the requirements for JOSS, but please let me know if there are any issues you would like me to address.

As for reviewers, I have seen 5 reviewers that I think would be suitable.

ArcticSnow
rwegener2
trchudley
laurenguido
facusapienza21