[PRE REVIEW]: FEniCSWEB - An Open-Source Application for Thermal Conduction Analysis: Integrating FEniCS with Django

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @harishragul (Harish Ragul Rajaramaduraikarthik)
Repository: https://github.com/harishragul/FenicsWeb
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS
Version: v1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5934b6d5e678ac6f1fb3fff5a74265c0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5934b6d5e678ac6f1fb3fff5a74265c0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5934b6d5e678ac6f1fb3fff5a74265c0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5934b6d5e678ac6f1fb3fff5a74265c0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @harishragul. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@harishragul if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-33287-6 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-52462-7 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The FEniCSx tutorial
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DOLFINx

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.11 s (1339.8 files/s, 276541.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      85           3898           3935          17420
CSS                             14            949             99           4072
Python                          25            158             94            553
HTML                             2             30             13            182
SVG                             20              0              0            126
XML                              5              0              0            116
Markdown                         2             32              0             82
TeX                              1              1              0             26
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           154           5068           4141          22577
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    26	harishragul
     1	Harish Ragul

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 846

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

scikit-finite-diff, a new tool for PDE solving
Submitting author: @celliern
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @mrava87, @poulson
Similarity score: 0.6778

scikit-fem: A Python package for finite element assembly
Submitting author: @kinnala
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @thelfer, @AnjaliSandip
Similarity score: 0.6773

PyGDH: Python Grid Discretization Helper
Submitting author: @kfhiga
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @JamieJQuinn, @zhaowei0566
Similarity score: 0.6769

FeenoX: a cloud-first finite-element(ish) computational engineering tool
Submitting author: @gtheler
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @vijaysm, @AnjaliSandip, @chennachaos
Similarity score: 0.6695

turtleFSI: A Robust and Monolithic FEniCS-based Fluid-Structure Interaction Solver
Submitting author: @albansouche
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @chennachaos, @JaroslavHron
Similarity score: 0.6683

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[harishragul]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

scikit-finite-diff, a new tool for PDE solving
Submitting author: @celliern
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @mrava87, @poulson
Similarity score: 0.6786

scikit-fem: A Python package for finite element assembly
Submitting author: @kinnala
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @thelfer, @AnjaliSandip
Similarity score: 0.6779

PyGDH: Python Grid Discretization Helper
Submitting author: @kfhiga
Handling editor: @melissawm (Retired)
Reviewers: @JamieJQuinn, @zhaowei0566
Similarity score: 0.6732

FeenoX: a cloud-first finite-element(ish) computational engineering tool
Submitting author: @gtheler
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @vijaysm, @AnjaliSandip, @chennachaos
Similarity score: 0.6703

turtleFSI: A Robust and Monolithic FEniCS-based Fluid-Structure Interaction Solver
Submitting author: @albansouche
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @chennachaos, @JaroslavHron
Similarity score: 0.6687

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.