Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge upstream master at 51907e0 #17

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Merge upstream master at 51907e0 #17

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

GMNGeoffrey
Copy link
Collaborator

@GMNGeoffrey GMNGeoffrey commented Jan 29, 2025

Merges from upstream at dmlc@51907e0.

I don't see anything that should create problems.

@GMNGeoffrey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ugh nevermind. dmlc#7855 switches to an API that isn't available till PyTorch 2.6 AFAICT (pytorch/pytorch@b14269d), which isn't even the stable release.

@GMNGeoffrey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm going to revert it locally. I'd rather have deprecation warnings for someone using a nightly release than not be buildable with the stable release. (although I sympathize. Deprecation warnings are really annoying. You can just build with -Wno-deprecated though...)

@GMNGeoffrey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reverts are annoying to track with merge commits though because they count as having been merged in, so it will create a persistent diff. A problem for another day though.

@GMNGeoffrey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Since I'll need local changes, it's going to require a new PR.

GMNGeoffrey added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
Merges from upstream at dmlc@51907e0.

Had to revert ba73133, which adds usage of an API that isn't in a stable PyTorch release yet. Original attempt to do this cleanly was #17. The remaining changes look like all Python which shouldn't be a problem. I tested that a full debug build passes all C++ and Python unit tests (non-distributed).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants