Reduction Plan Screen - Design

[mpatrou]

Description of Changes:

The changes are throughout the Design section

Related Items

To Test:

cd /path/to/my/local/garnet/repo/
git fetch origin pull/<PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER>/head:pr<PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER>
git switch pr<PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER>
conda activate <garnet_environment>
python -m pytest <item_to_test>

Check list for the pull request

• I have read the [CONTRIBUTING]
• I have read the [CODE_OF_CONDUCT]
• I have added tests for my changes
• I have updated the documentation accordingly

---

Check list for the reviewer

• I have read the [CONTRIBUTING]
• I have verified the proposed changes
• best software practices
  • all internal functions have an underbar, as is python standard
  • clearly named variables (better to be verbose in variable names)
  • code comments explaining the intent of code blocks
• All the tests are passing
• The documentation is up to date
• code comments added when explaining intent

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (82987cc) to head (ee81d4e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              next       #25   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           13        13           
  Lines          236       236           
=========================================
  Hits           236       236           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[marshallmcdonnell]

LGTM!

I have some thought for the design process overall but that will be better to communicate one on one.

Thanks!

[marshallmcdonnell]

Also I filled out the review check list what made sense but since these are only design docs and not code commits, I didn't really click things that didn't make sense.

[marshallmcdonnell]

Overall, LGTM!

One small typo to fix