Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Task] Combine chainsig-lib, multichain-tool, & near-ca #503

Open
1 of 4 tasks
Tracked by #502
thisisjoshford opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks
Tracked by #502

[Task] Combine chainsig-lib, multichain-tool, & near-ca #503

thisisjoshford opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@thisisjoshford
Copy link
Contributor

thisisjoshford commented Dec 19, 2024

Background

Currently, we have several dev tools for building applications that leverage Chain Signatures:

Each library has its own unique approach with varying levels of completeness. In favor of simplicity, one library should be chosen to become a foundational place for further development of a more feature-complete tool.

User Story

As a developer, I want an easy-to-use SDK / library that helps me build a successful chain abstraction application. As someone new to the space, I should not have to spend much time finding and evaluating several tools that do not appear to be production-ready.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Determine which library or tool should become the foundational place where we will combine features from other libraries
  • Combine chainsig-lib, multichain-tool, and near-ca and create a canonical library that abstracts all details of interacting with chain signatures from a frontend
  • Add hooks
  • Implement new interface, doesn’t support wallet signing unless individual wallet implements it, devEX can be improvised

Resources & Additional Notes

No response

Priority

🟠 P1 : High

@miaojiang
Copy link

TBD. Might transfer ownership to Near One.

@thisisjoshford thisisjoshford moved this from NEW❗ to Backlog 📖 in DevRel Jan 27, 2025
@gagdiez
Copy link

gagdiez commented Feb 3, 2025

Instead of combining the libraries, I would prefer if we just focus on one (multichain-tool seams like a great base) and make sure to:

  • use that one in all our examples
  • keep the tool polish and updated

@gagdiez gagdiez moved this from Backlog 📖 to In Progress 🏗️ in DevRel Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress 🏗️
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants