Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR] More clarity for the graph #35

Open
Faeust opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[FR] More clarity for the graph #35

Faeust opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@Faeust
Copy link

Faeust commented May 18, 2024

First of all I love this plug-in. It's perfect for my my cluttered way of worldbuilding and I hope it continues to develop!

I would like to suggest a few ways to clear up how the graph reads, though. If you turn on Arrows in Obsidian, they remain grey and clear compared to the colored lines when you turn on color-coding. Maybe if the arrow-tips themselves were also colored (and made larger?) to show which part refers to which? Or maybe the text would be colored based on which relationship it is?

If color doesn't work (not everyone likes it) maybe the text can be more split with one relationship being clearly closer to one note, and the other closer to the second note?

(Also, unsure if this is intended, but when I have the same relationship going back and forth (Spouse for instance) I still get two lines saying Spouse and Spouse.)

@Faeust Faeust changed the title More clarity for the graph [FR] More clarity for the graph May 23, 2024
@natefrisch01
Copy link
Owner

This is entirely possible to do, I'll keep it in mind for a future release!

@natefrisch01 natefrisch01 added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants