Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Plans for ariadne-graphql-modules #19

Closed
fabiangfd opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Question: Plans for ariadne-graphql-modules #19

fabiangfd opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@fabiangfd
Copy link

Hi, what are the plans for ariadne-graphql-modules going forward? Is it still actively maintained? There seems to be little activity in the repo. Will it eventually become part of the main ariadne project? Just wondering if it makes sense to commit to it now in a project that will run for a long time. Any hints are welcome.

@rafalp
Copy link
Contributor

rafalp commented Apr 26, 2023

Hi. This repo is not seeing much activity because it pretty much does what it was supposed to do: let people define GraphQL types using SDL, but separate those types into individual Python pieces.

Next big thing for this library is supporting code first approach to types definition, #12. I've did some experiments on this and I've got some ideas for how it's supposed to work, but I've had to pause that because GraphQL proxy tools is the priority for Mirumee.

Will it eventually become part of the main ariadne project?

Yes. Once it supports both SDL and code first approaches for GraphQL type definitions, it will be rolled into Ariadne. The plan is to let you pick any approach for schema definition that you want, and then migrate your types to other when other one no longer works for you.

@rafalp
Copy link
Contributor

rafalp commented Jul 20, 2023

Closing as answered

@rafalp rafalp closed this as completed Jul 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants