Support of very old Oregon Scientific Sensor THGR228 possible? #3121
Unanswered
riegelbrau
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
The signals don't look like PWM but MC -- there is data in the gaps, see https://triq.org/pdv/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have a very old monitoring station EMR812HG for temperature and humidity:
The station was sold together with a sensor THGR228:
(See the ancient logo of the Deutsche Bundespost, which was the former German autority for telecommunication).
Both units are working like a charm since then. Nowadays I have a Home Automation environment with several sensor integrated via RTL_433. It would be nice, if this old sensor would work for that, too. From the product numbers it seems to be made by Oregon Scientific. I found several internet sources for that assumption, where the THGR228 should be similar to the THR228N and it should use the OR protocol V2.1.
The actual release rtl_433 version 24.10-7-g54a886bf branch master at 202411201058 is running on a Raspberry Pi 4B and sends the gathered data via MQTT to openHAB. This is working good for several years. When I start rtl_433 with the 3 protocols for OregonScientific devices activated I get no resutls from my sensor. The I pulled the antenna from my rtl sdr dongle and positioned the sensor directly besides of it. Then I ran rtl_433 with this command
rtl_433 -d 0 -v -R -73 -R -112 -R -165 -Y autolevel -Y magest -M noise -M level -S unknown
. The following samples were written, when I saw the sensor sending data:g003_433.92M_250k.zip
g004_433.92M_250k.zip
g007_433.92M_250k.zip
Then I ran the program with several recommended flex decoder setting, like this:
rtl_433 -d 0 -v -R 0 -X 'n=THGR228,m=OOK_PWM,s=800,l=1296,r=2724,g=0,t=0,y=128'
From the results I extracted some data received, when the sensor was sending (LED flashing) like this:
I found this document as of 2016 describing the protocol:
WeatherSensor-RF-Protocols-IV_2016.pdf
As the next step I tried to interpret the recorded data using that document:
I think it might be V2.1 but not for sure. I don't understand the section of the document describing the sync nibble on page 7:
It would be great if someone could check my findings and get an opinion if the support of THGR228 would be possible with some acceptable effort. May be I am the only one, who is intersted in that.
Regards, Christoph
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions