Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

break(deps): bump @orama/orama and @orama/plugin-data-persistence to 3.0.5 #197

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

afrittella
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@afrittella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello, I wanted to fix the failing actions. At first sight I thought there were some breaking changes from Orama V2 to V3, but on my machine the tests are successful. 😐

README.md Outdated
| `^2.0.0` | `^5.0.0` | `^2.0.0` |
| `^1.0.0` | `^4.0.0` | `^2.0.0` |
|----------------|:---------------:|--------------:|
| `^2.0.0` | `^5.0.0` | `^3.0.0` |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would ship a new major here - it is free 😄

package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
@mateonunez
Copy link
Owner

Thank you a lot for the PR! As soon as this is merged, I'm gonna release a new version of the plugin

@Eomm Eomm changed the title chore(deps): bump @orama/orama and @orama/plugin-data-persistence to 3.0.5 break(deps): bump @orama/orama and @orama/plugin-data-persistence to 3.0.5 Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Owner

@mateonunez mateonunez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mateonunez mateonunez merged commit 7f2d731 into mateonunez:main Jan 31, 2025
3 checks passed
@afrittella afrittella deleted the update-to-orama-v3 branch February 3, 2025 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants