-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PSM Checklists] General improvements after feedback #35
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
84ea577
fix: bad precision on `mat`
amusingaxl 71dbf16
refactor: reorganize checks
amusingaxl f8d21e2
refactor: normalize hyphenation for "onboarding" and "offboarding"
amusingaxl 7857efc
feat: add checklist items for additional spell dependencies
amusingaxl afa642a
chore: add missing words to wordslist
amusingaxl a787516
refactor: address review comments
amusingaxl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would recommend to only have checkboxes for points that can be checked / validated as "correct". In other words, if a reviewer doesn't need to go somewhere and actively ensure some rule, no checkbox should be present. Otherwise, the mental meaning of checkbox is mixed up and might lead to confusion during the review. In the worst case, a reviewer will tick some checkbox without even checking anything.
If you agree, please apply this rule beyond this line (above and below in the checklist). I can at least see the same issue on lines 37, 51, 54, 60, 79, 90, 95, 102, 108, 112, 124, 129, 130, 132, 139, 140, 147, 151
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For 102 and 108 it kind of makes sense to have the check because they are conditional branches, so it you mark it, it means you are following that branch.
Also for visual consistency, maybe we should not be that strict that items with 1 single sub-item should be inlined.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But ticking the items found in the branch would already indicate which branch you followed. We also don't normally have checkboxes in all other branching IFs. I would recommend to remove them, but it's kind of hard to draw the line between e.g. IF on line 5 and IF on line 104, I wouldn't make it a blocker – sadly it's no a code for which we can have a linter