Improve checklist structure

[SidestreamColdMelon]

This PR addresses issues related to the structure of the checklist (as opposed to the content of it) discovered during onboarding of the new spell team members. Main problems we've discovered together with the solutions:

• Unclear differentiation between items that are not present and can be skipped and items that are not present, but have to be present
  • Solution: Introduce concept of branching using uppercase IF
• Unclear differentiation between the actual actionable and a category, explanation, option
  • Solution: Remove checkboxes from everywhere except the actual checks
• Confusing order of operations (first Exec Doc check is done before Exec Doc link is determined)
  • Solution: Rearrange checks in the order that does not confuse reviewer or leave a room for a mistake

[amusingaxl]

Good stuff! 💯

I believe this structure is an improvement, specially the introduction of branching.

I made a couple of suggestions, let me know what you think.

[amusingaxl]

LGTM!

Thanks for putting in the effort!

[amusingaxl]

LGTM