Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: run checks on a schedule and allow workflow_dispatch #90

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

hnez
Copy link
Member

@hnez hnez commented Jan 29, 2025

Running checks on a schedule makes sense for our ruff lints and our codespell spell checks, because these tools learn new lints/typo fixes every then and now.
Without periodic job runs these new lints/typo fixes will only surface when jobs for the next pull request fail for unrelated reasons.

The execution time of the scheduled job is chosen somewhat arbitrarily.

While at it also enable workflow_dispatch as a trigger, which can be used to run the jobs manually.

@hnez
Copy link
Member Author

hnez commented Jan 29, 2025

The failed CI job is unrelated to this PR and should be fixed in #89 (which is also what triggered this change in the first place 😉 ).

Running checks on a schedule makes sense for our `ruff` lints and
our `codespell` spell checks, because these tools learn new lints/typo
fixes every then and now.
Without periodic job runs these new lints/typo fixes will only surface
when jobs for the next pull request fail for unrelated reasons.

The execution time of the scheduled job is chosen somewhat arbitrarily.

While at it also enable workflow_dispatch as a trigger, which can be used
to run the jobs manually.

Signed-off-by: Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@pengutronix.de>
Copy link
Member

@SmithChart SmithChart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thx!

@SmithChart SmithChart merged commit d628efe into linux-automation:master Jan 30, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants