You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an issue to find the best replacement for stdlib rand(). It'll be great to enjoy all the benefits but care needs to be taken to ensure good quality of the implementation as it directly impact the quality of generated images.
Rationale:
Better performance: speed and quality
Stability across platforms / different stdlibs
Don't alter rand() sequence in case the user app relies on it
The new implementation does involve two more noise numbers (5 instead of 3) and two more bit shifts (5 instead of 3). So the performance characteristics will change.
This is an issue to find the best replacement for stdlib
rand()
. It'll be great to enjoy all the benefits but care needs to be taken to ensure good quality of the implementation as it directly impact the quality of generated images.Rationale:
Reference material
/cc @ggcrunchy, @ggsg-francis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: