Enable pre-commit workflow with manual dispatch trigger #83
Conversation
Signed-off-by: gitworkflows <118260833+gitworkflows@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR adds a new GitHub Actions workflow for pre-commit checks that can be manually triggered. The workflow is configured to run on Ubuntu with Python setup and uses the pre-commit action, but is initially disabled for automatic triggers on pull requests and pushes to main. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow named Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @gitworkflows - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider enabling the commented-out pull_request trigger to run pre-commit checks automatically on PRs. What was the reasoning behind making it manual-only?
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml (1)
1-9: Consider enabling automated pre-commit checks
The current configuration only allows manual triggering of pre-commit checks, which might lead to issues being caught later in the development cycle. While manual triggers provide flexibility, automated checks on PRs and pushes help maintain code quality proactively.
Consider:
- Enabling at least the pull_request trigger to ensure code quality before merging
- Adding a more detailed comment explaining why automatic triggers are disabled
- Removing commented code if the manual-only approach is intentional
Let's check if other workflows handle similar checks:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to understand if there are any other quality checks in place that might justify the manual-only trigger configuration.
Let me check the content of these test and lint workflows to understand the complete CI setup and whether pre-commit checks might be redundant.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Manual pre-commit triggers are appropriate in this setup
The current CI configuration already includes robust automated checks on PRs and pushes through the build-and-test.yaml and code_coverage.yaml workflows. These workflows handle the critical quality checks including unit tests and code coverage analysis. Having pre-commit checks as a manual workflow is a reasonable approach since:
- Core quality checks are already automated for PRs and pushes
- Pre-commit can serve as an additional, on-demand validation tool
- The comment on line 1 accurately indicates its intended manual nature
The current setup maintains a good balance between automated essential checks and optional manual validations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other workflows that might be handling similar checks
# Expected: No other workflows should be running pre-commit checks
# Search for other workflow files that might mention pre-commit
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "pre-commit"
# Search for pre-commit configuration
fd -H "^.pre-commit-config.yaml$"
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other quality check workflows and their triggers
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 -B 1 "on:"
# Look for any lint or test workflows
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l -E "lint|test"
Length of output: 2147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of build, test and lint workflows
cat .github/workflows/build-and-test.yaml
cat .github/workflows/code_coverage.yaml
# Check pre-commit config if it exists
fd -H "^.pre-commit-config.yaml$" -x cat {}
Length of output: 2333
| jobs: | ||
| pre-commit: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | ||
| - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 | ||
| # SEE https://github.com/pre-commit/action | ||
| - uses: pre-commit/action@v3.0.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Technical improvements needed for the workflow configuration
Several optimizations can enhance the workflow's efficiency and reliability:
- Update the checkout action to v4:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4- Specify Python version and add caching:
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+ with:
+ python-version: '3.x'
+ cache: 'pip'
+ - uses: actions/cache@v3
+ with:
+ path: ~/.cache/pre-commit
+ key: pre-commit-${{ hashFiles('.pre-commit-config.yaml') }}
# SEE https://github.com/pre-commit/action
- uses: pre-commit/action@v3.0.1These changes will:
- Address the outdated runner warning
- Ensure consistent Python version
- Speed up subsequent runs through caching
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| jobs: | |
| pre-commit: | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | |
| - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 | |
| # SEE https://github.com/pre-commit/action | |
| - uses: pre-commit/action@v3.0.1 | |
| jobs: | |
| pre-commit: | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | |
| - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 | |
| with: | |
| python-version: '3.x' | |
| cache: 'pip' | |
| - uses: actions/cache@v3 | |
| with: | |
| path: ~/.cache/pre-commit | |
| key: pre-commit-${{ hashFiles('.pre-commit-config.yaml') }} | |
| # SEE https://github.com/pre-commit/action | |
| - uses: pre-commit/action@v3.0.1 |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
User description
Notes for Reviewers
This PR fixes #
Signed commits
PR Type
enhancement, configuration changes
Description
pre-committo automate pre-commit checks.workflow_dispatch.pre-commit/action@v3.0.1.Changes walkthrough 📝
pre-commit.yml
Add pre-commit GitHub Actions workflow with manual trigger.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml
ubuntu-latest.pre-commit/action@v3.0.1for pre-commit checks.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores