Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for group membership via the front-proxy #1794

Closed
ncdc opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Add support for group membership via the front-proxy #1794

ncdc opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/authorization area/front-proxy lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@ncdc
Copy link
Member

ncdc commented Aug 18, 2022

For setups where an identity provider does not necessarily provide user groups that align with the workspace hierarchy in kcp, it would be nice to have a stop-gap solution to manage group membership in kcp itself.

The idea we'd like to explore is modifying the front proxy so it can read group membership data from somewhere with kcp itself, such as one or more configmaps. When a user makes a request to the front proxy, the proxy looks up group membership for the user and includes any groups found in the --requestheader-group-headers header on the request. See https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authentication/#authenticating-proxy for more details.

@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented Aug 18, 2022

cc @s-urbaniak

@csams csams added this to kcp Aug 18, 2022
@csams csams moved this to New in kcp Aug 18, 2022
@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov added this to the TBD milestone Aug 23, 2022
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

cc @csams

@ncdc ncdc moved this from New to Backlog in kcp Oct 17, 2022
@ncdc ncdc removed this from the TBD milestone Oct 17, 2022
@csams
Copy link
Contributor

csams commented Nov 13, 2022

I'm working on this in redhat-cps/front-proxy#3

@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
After a furter 30 days, they will turn rotten.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 14, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 14, 2024
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@kcp-ci-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in kcp Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/authorization area/front-proxy lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants