Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor CI/CD workflow #302

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

Refactor CI/CD workflow #302

merged 14 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

kamiazya
Copy link
Owner

@kamiazya kamiazya commented Jul 27, 2024

This pull request refactors the CI/CD workflow to integrate it more seamlessly into the development process.

The changes include updating the workflow triggers, permissions, and steps for building, releasing, and deploying the package.

This refactor improves the efficiency and reliability of the CI/CD pipeline.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a custom GitHub Actions setup action for streamlined development environment configuration including Node.js, C++, and Rust.
    • Added a new workflow for executing dynamic tests across various environments and browsers.
    • Created static tests workflow to ensure code quality through formatting and linting checks.
    • Established a main workflow to manage builds and releases, integrating static and dynamic tests.
  • Improvements

    • Simplified release process by consolidating setup steps and removing unnecessary dependencies.
    • Enhanced CI/CD pipeline clarity and efficiency with modular actions and improved testing coverage.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues in previous workflows by enhancing job dependencies and execution paths.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 27, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3406fdd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates significantly enhance GitHub Actions workflows by introducing modular setup actions for Node.js, C++, and Rust. These changes streamline the CI/CD process, consolidating multiple installation steps into reusable actions and improving maintainability. New jobs focus on static and dynamic testing across various environments, enhancing code quality and efficiency. The release process has been simplified, emphasizing clarity and reducing dependencies, fostering a more effective development pipeline.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/actions/setup/action.yaml Introduced a new composite action for setting up development environments with Node.js, C++, and Rust.
.github/workflows/.build.yaml Simplified workflow by using the new setup action; added type checking step.
.github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml Created a new workflow for dynamic tests across multiple environments, including Node.js and browsers.
.github/workflows/.release.yaml Restructured release process; consolidated Node.js setup and removed build job dependency.
.github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml Introduced checks for code formatting and Rust quality using Clippy and Rustfmt.
.github/workflows/main.yaml Added a comprehensive main workflow that coordinates static tests, builds, dynamic tests, and releases.
.github/workflows/pr-snapshot-release.yaml Streamlined Node.js setup process by utilizing the custom action for setup.
.changeset/violet-hornets-kick.md Introduced a patch for CI/CD workflow improvements.
.changeset/perfect-oranges-hide.md Updated development dependency typedoc-plugin-mdn-links to a newer version.
.github/workflows/ci.yaml Updated version of CodSpeedHQ/action from v2.4.2 to v3.0.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Setup Action
    participant Tests
    participant Release

    User->>GitHub Actions: Push changes
    GitHub Actions->>Setup Action: Prepare development environment
    Setup Action->>GitHub Actions: Environment ready
    GitHub Actions->>Tests: Run static and dynamic tests
    Tests->>GitHub Actions: Tests complete
    GitHub Actions->>Release: Initiate release
    Release->>GitHub Actions: Release successful
Loading

🐰🌟 In the meadow, a rabbit hops,
With workflows sleek, the setup tops!
From Node to Rust, all in a line,
Testing and releases, oh so fine!
Bouncing through code, with joy we cheer,
A smoother path, the future's clear! 🌈✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 1.11kB ⬆️

Bundle name Size Change
web-csv-toolbox-CSV-esm 220.34kB 433 bytes ⬆️
web-csv-toolbox-CSV-esm-CSV-cjs 209.75kB 433 bytes ⬆️
web-csv-toolbox-CSV-umd 118.01kB 248 bytes ⬆️

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 27, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #302 will degrade performances by 88.26%

Comparing improve-workflow (3406fdd) with main (8579cb0)

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark main improve-workflow Change
parseStringToArraySyncWASM(50 rows) 582.1 µs 4,958.4 µs -88.26%

@kamiazya kamiazya marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2024 08:18
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/.build.yaml (2)

Update the action version.

The specified version of the actions/upload-artifact action is not the latest. Please update it to the latest version v4.3.4.

  • Current version: v4.3.3
  • Latest version: v4.3.4
Analysis chain

Line range hint 24-27:
Verify the action version.

Ensure that the actions/upload-artifact action version v4.3.3 is up-to-date and correctly specified.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the version of the `actions/upload-artifact` action.

# Test: Check if the specified version is the latest. Expect: The version should be the latest.
latest_version=$(gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/upload-artifact/releases/latest | jq -r .tag_name)
specified_version="v4.3.3"

if [ "$latest_version" == "$specified_version" ]; then
  echo "The specified version is the latest."
else
  echo "The specified version is not the latest. The latest version is $latest_version."
fi

Length of output: 348


Update action version and verify artifact path

  • The specified version of the actions/upload-artifact action is not the latest. Please update it to the latest version v4.3.4.
  • The artifact path web-csv-toolbox-wasm/**/* does not exist. Please verify the existence and correctness of the web-csv-toolbox-wasm directory and its contents.
Analysis chain

Line range hint 28-36:
Verify the action version and artifact paths.

Ensure that the actions/upload-artifact action version v4.3.3 is up-to-date and correctly specified. Verify the correctness of the artifact paths.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the version of the `actions/upload-artifact` action and the correctness of the artifact paths.

# Test: Check if the specified version is the latest. Expect: The version should be the latest.
latest_version=$(gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/upload-artifact/releases/latest | jq -r .tag_name)
specified_version="v4.3.3"

if [ "$latest_version" == "$specified_version" ]; then
  echo "The specified version is the latest."
else
  echo "The specified version is not the latest. The latest version is $latest_version."
fi

# Test: Verify the correctness of the artifact paths. Expect: The paths should be correct.
artifact_paths=(
  "web-csv-toolbox-wasm/**/*"
  "!web-csv-toolbox-wasm/src"
  "!web-csv-toolbox-wasm/target"
  "!web-csv-toolbox-wasm/Cargo.toml"
  "!web-csv-toolbox-wasm/Cargo.lock"
  "!web-csv-toolbox-wasm/.gitignore"
)

for path in "${artifact_paths[@]}"; do
  if [[ $path == !* ]]; then
    continue
  fi
  if [ ! -e "${path//!/}" ]; then
    echo "The artifact path ${path//!/} does not exist."
  fi
done

Length of output: 1274

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 93c79c3 and 3a42b47.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/actions/setup/action.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/.build.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/.release.yaml (6 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pr-snapshot-release.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (27)
.github/workflows/main.yaml (4)

16-22: Verify the referenced workflow file and secret usage.

Ensure that the .build.yaml file exists and is correctly configured. Verify the correct usage of the CODECOV_TOKEN secret.

Verification successful

Verification successful.

The .build.yaml file exists and the CODECOV_TOKEN secret is correctly defined and utilized within the file.

  • .github/workflows/.build.yaml: The file exists and includes the CODECOV_TOKEN secret.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the `.build.yaml` workflow file and the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret.

# Test: Check if the file exists. Expect: The file should exist.
if [ -f .github/workflows/.build.yaml ]; then
  echo "The .build.yaml file exists."
else
  echo "The .build.yaml file does not exist."
fi

# Test: Search for the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret in the codebase. Expect: The secret should be used correctly.
rg --type yaml 'CODECOV_TOKEN'

Length of output: 140


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret within the `.build.yaml` workflow file.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret in the .build.yaml file. Expect: The secret should be used correctly.
rg 'CODECOV_TOKEN' .github/workflows/.build.yaml -A 5

Length of output: 443


12-15: Verify the referenced workflow file.

Ensure that the .static-tests.yaml file exists and is correctly configured.

Verification successful

The referenced workflow file is correctly configured.

The .static-tests.yaml file exists and is properly set up for static tests.

  • The file contains jobs for checking format and running Clippy and Rustfmt.
  • Each job includes necessary steps such as checking out the repository, setting up the environment, and running the respective commands.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the `.static-tests.yaml` workflow file.

# Test: Check if the file exists. Expect: The file should exist.
if [ -f .github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml ]; then
  echo "The .static-tests.yaml file exists."
else
  echo "The .static-tests.yaml file does not exist."
fi

Length of output: 130


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the content of the `.static-tests.yaml` workflow file to ensure it is correctly configured for static tests.

# Display the content of the file
cat .github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml

Length of output: 1118


24-32: Verify the referenced workflow file and secret usage.

Ensure that the .dynamic-tests.yaml file exists and is correctly configured. Verify the correct usage of the CODECOV_TOKEN and CODSPEED_TOKEN secrets.

Verification successful

Verification successful.

The .dynamic-tests.yaml file exists and correctly references the CODECOV_TOKEN and CODSPEED_TOKEN secrets.

  • .github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the `.dynamic-tests.yaml` workflow file and the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` and `CODSPEED_TOKEN` secrets.

# Test: Check if the file exists. Expect: The file should exist.
if [ -f .github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml ]; then
  echo "The .dynamic-tests.yaml file exists."
else
  echo "The .dynamic-tests.yaml file does not exist."
fi

# Test: Search for the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` and `CODSPEED_TOKEN` secrets in the codebase. Expect: The secrets should be used correctly.
rg --type yaml 'CODECOV_TOKEN|CODSPEED_TOKEN'

Length of output: 181


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` and `CODSPEED_TOKEN` secrets in the `.dynamic-tests.yaml` workflow file.

# Check the usage of the secrets in the `.dynamic-tests.yaml` file.
rg 'CODECOV_TOKEN|CODSPEED_TOKEN' .github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml

Length of output: 217


34-43: Verify the referenced workflow file, secret usage, and conditional statement.

Ensure that the .release.yaml file exists and is correctly configured. Verify the correct usage of the NPM_TOKEN secret and the conditional statement.

.github/workflows/.build.yaml (4)

Line range hint 8-8:
Verify the action version.

Ensure that the actions/checkout action version v4.1.7 is up-to-date and correctly specified.

Verification successful

The specified version of the actions/checkout action is up-to-date.

  • The version v4.1.7 is the latest available.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the version of the `actions/checkout` action.

# Test: Check if the specified version is the latest. Expect: The version should be the latest.
latest_version=$(gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" /repos/actions/checkout/releases/latest | jq -r .tag_name)
specified_version="v4.1.7"

if [ "$latest_version" == "$specified_version" ]; then
  echo "The specified version is the latest."
else
  echo "The specified version is not the latest. The latest version is $latest_version."
fi

Length of output: 273


22-23: Verify the type check command.

Ensure that the pnpm check:type command is correctly specified.


16-17: Verify the custom action.

Ensure that the custom action located at ./.github/actions/setup exists and is correctly configured.

Verification successful

The custom action is correctly configured.

The custom action located at ./.github/actions/setup exists and is properly set up with a detailed action.yaml file.

  • The custom action includes steps for setting up Node.js, pnpm, C++, and Rust.
  • The action.yaml file is well-defined and aligns with the Setup step in the workflow.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the custom action located at `./.github/actions/setup`.

# Test: Check if the custom action exists. Expect: The custom action should exist.
if [ -d .github/actions/setup ]; then
  echo "The custom action exists."
else
  echo "The custom action does not exist."
fi

Length of output: 95


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the configuration of the custom action located at `./.github/actions/setup`.

# Check if action.yml or action.yaml exists in the custom action directory.
if [ -f .github/actions/setup/action.yml ]; then
  echo "action.yml exists."
  cat .github/actions/setup/action.yml
elif [ -f .github/actions/setup/action.yaml ]; then
  echo "action.yaml exists."
  cat .github/actions/setup/action.yaml
else
  echo "Neither action.yml nor action.yaml exists."
fi

Length of output: 1890


18-21: Verify the build command and secret usage.

Ensure that the pnpm run build command is correctly specified and that the CODECOV_TOKEN secret is used securely.

Verification successful

The build command is correctly specified and the CODECOV_TOKEN is used securely.

  • The pnpm run build command is correctly specified in package.json.
  • The CODECOV_TOKEN is used securely in vite.config.ts and config/vite.config.umd.ts.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the `pnpm run build` command and the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret.

# Test: Check if the `pnpm run build` command is correctly specified. Expect: The command should be correctly specified.
if grep -q 'pnpm run build' package.json; then
  echo "The build command is correctly specified."
else
  echo "The build command is not correctly specified."
fi

# Test: Search for the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret in the codebase. Expect: The secret should be used securely.
rg --type yaml 'CODECOV_TOKEN'

Length of output: 171


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the `pnpm run build` command and the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret.

# Display the `scripts` section of `package.json` to verify the `build` command.
jq '.scripts' package.json

# Search for the usage of the `CODECOV_TOKEN` secret in the entire codebase.
rg 'CODECOV_TOKEN'

Length of output: 1178

.github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml (2)

6-19: Verify the custom action and format check command.

Ensure that the custom action located at ./.github/actions/setup exists and is correctly configured. Verify the correctness of the pnpm check:format command.

Verification successful

Verification successful.

The custom action located at ./.github/actions/setup exists and is correctly configured. The pnpm check:format command is also correctly specified in the package.json file.

  • The custom action exists.
  • The format check command is correctly specified.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the custom action located at `./.github/actions/setup` and the `pnpm check:format` command.

# Test: Check if the custom action exists. Expect: The custom action should exist.
if [ -d .github/actions/setup ]; then
  echo "The custom action exists."
else
  echo "The custom action does not exist."
fi

# Test: Check if the `pnpm check:format` command is correctly specified. Expect: The command should be correctly specified.
if grep -q 'pnpm check:format' package.json; then
  echo "The format check command is correctly specified."
else
  echo "The format check command is not correctly specified."
fi

Length of output: 245


21-38: Verify the custom action and Clippy/Rustfmt commands.

Ensure that the custom action located at ./.github/actions/setup exists and is correctly configured. Verify the correctness of the cargo clippy and cargo fmt commands.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the custom action located at `./.github/actions/setup` and the `cargo clippy` and `cargo fmt` commands.

# Test: Check if the custom action exists. Expect: The custom action should exist.
if [ -d

<details>
<summary>Verification successful</summary>



---

<!-- [monologue]
[task review_file_3/3 job_2/2] Continue reviewing job `check_clippy_and_rustfmt`.
[observations] The custom action directory `./.github/actions/setup` exists and contains an `action.yaml` file, indicating it is correctly set up. The `cargo clippy` and `cargo fmt` commands are present in the workflow file and appear to be correctly specified.
[analysis] The custom action is present and seems to be correctly configured. The `cargo clippy` and `cargo fmt` commands are also correctly specified in the workflow file. There are no issues found with the current configuration.
[actions] Conclude the verification process by generating the final response indicating that the verification is successful.
-->

**Verification successful.**

The custom action located at `./.github/actions/setup` exists and is correctly configured. The `cargo clippy` and `cargo fmt` commands are correctly specified in the workflow file.

- Custom action directory: `./.github/actions/setup`
- Commands:
  - `cargo clippy --manifest-path=./web-csv-toolbox-wasm/Cargo.toml --all-targets --all-features`
  - `cargo fmt --manifest-path=./web-csv-toolbox-wasm/Cargo.toml --all -- --check`



</details>


<details>
<summary>Scripts executed</summary>

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:



---

Script:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the custom action directory exists
if [ -d "./.github/actions/setup" ]; then
  echo "Custom action directory exists."
else
  echo "Custom action directory does not exist."
fi

# List the contents of the custom action directory
if [ -d "./.github/actions/setup" ]; then
  echo "Contents of the custom action directory:"
  ls -l ./.github/actions/setup
fi

# Search for the `cargo clippy` command in the workflow file
echo "Searching for 'cargo clippy' command in the workflow file:"
rg "cargo clippy" .github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml -A 3

# Search for the `cargo fmt` command in the workflow file
echo "Searching for 'cargo fmt' command in the workflow file:"
rg "cargo fmt" .github/workflows/.static-tests.yaml -A 3

Length of output: 982

.github/actions/setup/action.yaml (8)

1-3: LGTM!

The metadata section is well-defined.


4-12: LGTM!

The inputs section is well-defined with appropriate descriptions and default values.


14-15: LGTM!

The runs section is well-defined.


20-31: LGTM!

The steps for setting up Node.js are well-defined and handle both cases of node-version being provided or not.


32-34: LGTM!

The step for installing dependencies is well-defined.


35-40: LGTM!

The steps for setting up C++ are well-defined.


41-51: LGTM!

The steps for setting up Rust are well-defined.


49-52: LGTM!

The step for installing wasm-pack is well-defined.

.github/workflows/.release.yaml (5)

1-8: LGTM!

The metadata section is well-defined with the new workflow_call trigger and required secret NPM_TOKEN.


Line range hint 9-29:
LGTM!

The release job is well-defined with consolidated setup steps and a clear release process.


Line range hint 30-47:
LGTM!

The prerelease job is well-defined and simplifies the workflow by removing unnecessary dependencies.


Line range hint 48-98:
LGTM!

The doc job is well-defined with setup steps and deployment steps to GitHub Pages.


Line range hint 99-122:
LGTM!

The final steps for deploying documentation to GitHub Pages are well-defined.

.github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml (3)

1-11: LGTM!

The metadata section is well-defined with the workflow_call trigger and required secrets CODECOV_TOKEN and CODSPEED_TOKEN.


46-60: LGTM!

The test_nodejs job is well-defined with steps for checking out the repository, setting up the environment, and running tests for multiple Node.js versions.


61-81: LGTM!

The test_deno job is well-defined with steps for checking out the repository, setting up the environment, and running tests for Deno.

.github/workflows/pr-snapshot-release.yaml (1)

91-92: Verify the custom setup action.

The new "Setup" step uses a custom action located at ./.github/actions/setup. Ensure that this custom action is correctly implemented and covers all necessary setup steps.

.github/actions/setup/action.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/.dynamic-tests.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a42b47 and 6a87a9f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/actions/setup/action.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/actions/setup/action.yaml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a87a9f and 06708af.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/violet-hornets-kick.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .changeset/violet-hornets-kick.md

@kamiazya kamiazya requested a review from nagasawaryoya July 27, 2024 13:39
@kamiazya kamiazya self-assigned this Jul 27, 2024
@kamiazya kamiazya added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 27, 2024
dependabot bot and others added 2 commits August 9, 2024 20:05
)

* build(deps-dev): bump typedoc-plugin-mdn-links from 3.2.1 to 3.2.4

Bumps [typedoc-plugin-mdn-links](https://github.com/Gerrit0/typedoc-plugin-mdn-links) from 3.2.1 to 3.2.4.
- [Changelog](https://github.com/Gerrit0/typedoc-plugin-mdn-links/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](Gerrit0/typedoc-plugin-mdn-links@v3.2.1...v3.2.4)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: typedoc-plugin-mdn-links
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

* Create perfect-oranges-hide.md

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuki Yamazaki <35218186+kamiazya@users.noreply.github.com>
Bumps [CodSpeedHQ/action](https://github.com/codspeedhq/action) from 2.4.2 to 3.0.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/codspeedhq/action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/CodSpeedHQ/action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](CodSpeedHQ/action@f11c406...ab07afd)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: CodSpeedHQ/action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 06708af and e5fda8f.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/perfect-oranges-hide.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .changeset/perfect-oranges-hide.md
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)

127-127: Verify compatibility with CodSpeedHQ/action@v3.0.0.

The update to a new major version could introduce breaking changes. Ensure to review the release notes or changelog for CodSpeedHQ/action@v3.0.0 to confirm compatibility and understand any new features or changes.

@kamiazya kamiazya merged commit 1032118 into main Aug 9, 2024
39 checks passed
@kamiazya kamiazya deleted the improve-workflow branch August 9, 2024 13:15
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant