Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] change to use Clarabel in more tutorials #3944

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

[docs] change to use Clarabel in more tutorials #3944

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

odow
Copy link
Member

@odow odow commented Feb 13, 2025

This discourse post (https://discourse.julialang.org/t/jump-scs-tutorial-example-fails-on-simple-data/125857/3) points out that SCS is not very robust, and indeed, in many places we need to tweak the tolerances to get things to work. We already have Clarabel in docs, so let's use that instead.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.58%. Comparing base (f70d138) to head (cae8abe).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3944   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.58%   99.58%           
=======================================
  Files          43       43           
  Lines        6066     6066           
=======================================
  Hits         6041     6041           
  Misses         25       25           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@odow odow merged commit 2d26cdb into master Feb 14, 2025
11 checks passed
@odow odow deleted the od/clarabel branch February 14, 2025 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant