feat: add Olostep integration #1213
Conversation
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
|||||||||||
WalkthroughThe update integrates Olostep for web scraping, enhancing capabilities with fast response times, bot detection avoidance, and parallel processing. It includes a detailed configuration guide, scraping methods, and error handling. An environment variable for the Olostep API key is added, along with models for handling responses. The Olostep provider is integrated into the system, and a mock response is included for testing. Changes
Entelligence.ai can learn from your feedback. Simply add 👍 / 👎 emojis to teach it your preferences. More shortcuts belowEmoji Descriptions:
Interact with the Bot:
|
![entelligence-ai-pr-reviews[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/932812?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| olostep = BaseProvider( | ||
| provider="olostep", | ||
| setup=OlostepSetup, | ||
| methods=[ | ||
| BaseProviderMethod( | ||
| method="scrape", | ||
| description="Scrape website content using Olostep API", | ||
| arguments=OlostepScrapeArguments, | ||
| output=OlostepOutput, | ||
| ), | ||
| ], | ||
| info=ProviderInfo( | ||
| url="https://olostep.com/", | ||
| docs="https://docs.olostep.com/", | ||
| icon="https://www.olostep.com/images/olostep-logo-cropped.svg", | ||
| friendly_name="Olostep", | ||
| ), | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing imports for OlostepSetup, OlostepScrapeArguments, and OlostepOutput which are required for the new Olostep provider. This will cause runtime import errors.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| olostep = BaseProvider( | |
| provider="olostep", | |
| setup=OlostepSetup, | |
| methods=[ | |
| BaseProviderMethod( | |
| method="scrape", | |
| description="Scrape website content using Olostep API", | |
| arguments=OlostepScrapeArguments, | |
| output=OlostepOutput, | |
| ), | |
| ], | |
| info=ProviderInfo( | |
| url="https://olostep.com/", | |
| docs="https://docs.olostep.com/", | |
| icon="https://www.olostep.com/images/olostep-logo-cropped.svg", | |
| friendly_name="Olostep", | |
| ), | |
| ) | |
| from .olostep.setup import OlostepSetup | |
| from .olostep.arguments import OlostepScrapeArguments | |
| from .olostep.output import OlostepOutput | |
| olostep = BaseProvider( | |
| provider="olostep", | |
| setup=OlostepSetup, | |
| methods=[ | |
| BaseProviderMethod( | |
| method="scrape", | |
| description="Scrape website content using Olostep API", | |
| arguments=OlostepScrapeArguments, | |
| output=OlostepOutput, | |
| ), | |
| ], | |
| info=ProviderInfo( | |
| url="https://olostep.com/", | |
| docs="https://docs.olostep.com/", | |
| icon="https://www.olostep.com/images/olostep-logo-cropped.svg", | |
| friendly_name="Olostep", | |
| ), | |
| ) |
| try: | ||
| async with get_olostep_client(api_key) as client: | ||
| payload = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The aiohttp.ClientSession is not properly closed if an exception occurs before entering the async with block. Should use try/finally to ensure cleanup.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| try: | |
| async with get_olostep_client(api_key) as client: | |
| payload = { | |
| client = await get_olostep_client(api_key) | |
| try: | |
| async with client as session: | |
| payload = { |
| if value := arguments.params.get(key): | ||
| payload[key] = value | ||
|
|
||
| async with client.post("https://api.olostep.com/v1/scrapes", json=payload) as response: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing timeout configuration for HTTP requests which could lead to hanging requests. Should add timeout parameter to client.post().
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| async with client.post("https://api.olostep.com/v1/scrapes", json=payload) as response: | |
| async with client.post("https://api.olostep.com/v1/scrapes", json=payload, timeout=30) as response: |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to cbacd6c in 3 minutes and 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
470lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
9drafted comments based on config settings.
1. documentation/docs/integrations/web_browser_automation/olostep.mdx:184
- Draft comment:
Missing newline at end of file. Please add one for POSIX compliance. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
Missing newlines at end of files are a common convention and can cause issues with some tools. However, this is a documentation file and the impact would be minimal. Most modern editors handle this automatically. The comment is technically correct but very minor.
The comment is about a real issue and provides a concrete fix. Missing newlines can cause issues with git diffs and some text processing tools.
While technically correct, this is an extremely minor issue that most modern tools handle gracefully. It's more noise than value in the PR review.
Delete the comment as it's too minor of an issue to warrant attention in code review, especially for a documentation file.
2. integrations-service/integrations/providers.py:93
- Draft comment:
OlostepSetup and OlostepScrapeArguments are used but not imported. Please add the appropriate imports from autogen.Tools. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/olostep.py:71
- Draft comment:
Consider logging exception details before re-raising RuntimeError for better diagnostics. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
4. documentation/docs/integrations/web_browser_automation/olostep.mdx:184
- Draft comment:
Add a newline at the end-of-file to improve POSIX compliance. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
While having a newline at EOF is generally good practice, this is a very minor issue that would typically be handled by editor configurations or linting rules. The comment doesn't point out a significant problem that needs human attention. Most modern text editors automatically add newlines at EOF.
The suggestion is technically correct and follows Unix conventions. Not having a newline at EOF could cause issues with some tools.
While technically valid, this is too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment. It should be handled by automation rather than human review.
Delete this comment as it's too minor of an issue to warrant human attention in code review. This should be handled by editor configs or linting rules.
5. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/olostep.py:51
- Draft comment:
Handle the optional 'params' gracefully to avoid AttributeError when it is None. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The code uses @beartype decorator and has type assertions checking that arguments is OlostepScrapeArguments. If this is properly typed, params should be defined. Without seeing OlostepScrapeArguments definition, we can't be certain if params can be None. The code seems to follow a consistent pattern assuming params exists.
I don't have visibility into OlostepScrapeArguments class definition. The params field could potentially be optional.
Given the strict typing and assertions, plus consistent usage pattern, the code likely assumes params is a required field of OlostepScrapeArguments. If it wasn't, we'd expect to see null checks elsewhere too.
The comment should be deleted as it appears to be speculative without strong evidence that params can be None, especially given the strict typing in place.
6. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/olostep.py:26
- Draft comment:
Consider including additional metadata from the API response (e.g., a 'created' timestamp) in the response's metadata field. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
7. integrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/olostep.py:76
- Draft comment:
The file does not end with a newline which might create issues in some setups. Please add a newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
Missing newlines at end of file can cause issues with some tools and is generally considered good practice. However, this is a very minor issue that would likely be caught by linters or formatters. It's not a logic issue or code quality problem that needs human attention.
The comment is technically correct and follows a common convention. Missing newlines can cause subtle issues in some scenarios.
While technically valid, this is exactly the kind of minor formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments. It doesn't affect functionality or code quality in a meaningful way.
Delete the comment as it addresses a minor formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than taking up reviewer and author attention.
8. typespec/tools/models.tsp:62
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the comment on line 61/62, "overriden" should be corrected to "overridden" for clarity and accuracy. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
9. typespec/tools/models.tsp:65
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the comment on line 64/65, "overriden" should be changed to "overridden" for better readability and correctness. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_EcaolMJRkrRXAfie
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ | |||
| WikipediaSearchOutput, | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| from .utils.integrations.olostep import scrape | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Explicitly import OlostepSetup and OlostepScrapeArguments to ensure they’re defined.
| from .utils.integrations.olostep import scrape | |
| from .utils.integrations.olostep import scrape, OlostepSetup, OlostepScrapeArguments |
| except Exception as e: | ||
| # Log the exception or handle it as needed | ||
| msg = f"Error executing Olostep scrape: {str(e)}" | ||
| raise RuntimeError(msg) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use exception chaining (e.g., raise RuntimeError(...) from e) to preserve original traceback details.
| raise RuntimeError(msg) | |
| raise RuntimeError(msg) from e |
|
sorry for the long wait @aadithyanr , this slipped through the cracks. picking this up this week. in the meantime, it'd be super helpful if you are able to resolve merge conflicts and as many of the AI reviewer comments as possible |
User description
Add Olostep Integration
This PR adds Olostep as a new integration provider to Julep, offering superior web scraping capabilities.
Features
Implementation
Files Added
typespec/tools/olostep.tsp- TypeSpec definitionintegrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/olostep.py- Integration logicintegrations-service/tests/mocks/olostep.py- Test mocksdocumentation/docs/integrations/olostep.mdx- DocumentationFiles Modified
typespec/tools/models.tsp- Added Olostep to provider listintegrations-service/integrations/providers.py- Registered providerintegrations-service/integrations/env.py- Added API key variablePS: Let me know if you'd like any changes or have questions about the implementation.
PR Type
Enhancement, Documentation, Tests
Description
Added Olostep integration for advanced web scraping.
scrapemethod with async support.Updated provider registry and environment configuration.
providers.py.OLOSTEP_API_KEYto environment variables.Provided comprehensive documentation for Olostep usage.
olostep.mdx.Added test mocks for Olostep integration.
Changes walkthrough 📝
env.py
Add Olostep API key to environment variablesintegrations-service/integrations/env.py
olostep_api_keyenvironment variable.olostep.py
Add Pydantic models for Olostep responsesintegrations-service/integrations/models/olostep.py
OlostepResponseandOlostepOutputclasses.providers.py
Register Olostep provider and methodsintegrations-service/integrations/providers.py
scrapemethod and provider info.olostep.py
Implement Olostep scrape method with retry logicintegrations-service/integrations/utils/integrations/olostep.py
scrapemethod for Olostep API.models.tsp
Update TypeSpec models with Olostep providertypespec/tools/models.tsp
olostepto integration provider list.olostep.tsp
Add TypeSpec definitions for Olostep integrationtypespec/tools/olostep.tsp
olostep.py
Add test mocks for Olostep integrationintegrations-service/tests/mocks/olostep.py
olostep.mdx
Add documentation for Olostep integrationdocumentation/docs/integrations/web_browser_automation/olostep.mdx
EntelligenceAI PR Summary
Purpose: Enhance web scraping with Olostep for faster, bot-resistant, parallel processing.
Changes:
models.tspand createdolostep.tspfor setup and argument models.Impact: Improved data extraction speed and reliability, enhanced user understanding, and more robust testing.