Feat/vip weight vote #38
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates introduce new functionalities and optimizations to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VIPModule as VIP Module
participant WeightVoteModule as Weight Vote Module
User->>+VIPModule: call is_registered(bridge_id)
VIPModule-->>-User: returns bool
User->>+VIPModule: call update_vip_weights(bridge_ids, weights)
VIPModule->>+WeightVoteModule: call update_vip_weights_for_friend(bridge_ids, weights)
WeightVoteModule-->>-VIPModule: updates weights
VIPModule-->>-User: weights updated
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1)
179-206: Consider adding detailed documentation for theinitializefunction.It would be beneficial for maintainability and clarity to include a detailed comment block at the beginning of the
initializefunction explaining its purpose, parameters, and any side effects.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (8)
679-690: Review the use ofinlineinremove_former_vote.As previously commented by
sh-cha, consider the necessity of usinginlinehere given the potential performance implications.
292-293: Update tally decrement logic invote.As noted by
sh-cha, ensure thattotal_tallyis decremented when removing a former vote.
443-446: Use constants for vote options.As suggested by
sh-cha, replace magic numbers with constantsVOTE_YESandVOTE_NOto improve code clarity.
784-787: Clarify the purpose ofinit_metadata.As noted by
sh-cha, consider renaminginit_metadatato avoid confusion with 'initialize metadata'.
745-745: DefinePROOF_LENGTHmore clearly.As suggested by
sh-cha, ensure thatPROOF_LENGTHis defined clearly and used consistently throughout the code.
697-699: Consider adding a stage or block height for the voting power hash.As noted by
JSHan94, it might be necessary to include a voting stage or block height in the voting power hash for better traceability and security.
462-462: Review the necessity of the loop in tally adjustment.As pointed out by
sh-cha, the loop might be unnecessary iflenis always expected to be 1. Consider simplifying this logic.
90-90: Clarify the purpose ofapi_uriinWeightVote.As queried by
sh-cha, provide a clear explanation or documentation on the use ofapi_uriwithin theWeightVotestruct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1)
440-491: Consider using constants forVOTE_YESandVOTE_NOinvote_challenge_proposal.Using constants can improve the readability and maintainability of your code by replacing magic numbers with meaningful names.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (3)
182-209: Ensure proper error handling for theinitializefunction.Verification successful
The error handling in the
initializefunction appears to be consistent with other functions in the codebase. Theassert!statements in theinitializefunction use error codes and messages in a manner similar to other functions, ensuring proper error handling.
- The
initializefunction usesassert!statements with specific error codes and messages, such aserror::permission_denied(EUNAUTHORIZED)anderror::already_exists(EMODULE_STORE_ALREADY_EXISTS).- This pattern is consistent with other functions in the codebase, which also use
assert!statements with error codes and messages to handle errors.Based on the gathered information, the error handling in the
initializefunction is consistent with the rest of the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the error handling in `initialize` is consistent with other functions. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in other functions. Expect: Consistent usage of error codes and messages. rg --type move $'assert!\\('Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the error handling in `initialize` is consistent with other functions. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in other functions. Expect: Consistent usage of error codes and messages. rg 'assert!\(' --glob '*.move'Length of output: 234598
508-541: Ensure that theexecute_proposal_internalfunction handles all edge cases correctly.Verification successful
The search results show numerous
assert!statements across various Move files, indicating that assertions are widely used for error handling and validation. However, to ensure that theexecute_proposal_internalfunction specifically handles all edge cases correctly, we need to focus on the assertions and logic within this function itself.Given the context, the
execute_proposal_internalfunction already includes several assertions to handle different states and conditions. Here are the key assertions and checks within the function:
Proposal Existence Check:
assert!(table::contains(&module_store.proposals, key), error::not_found(EPROPOSAL_NOT_FOUND));Voting End Time or Quorum Check:
assert!( proposal.voting_end_time < timestamp || total_tally >= proposal.quorum, error::invalid_state(EPROPOSAL_IN_PROGRESS), );Proposal Execution State Check:
assert!(!proposal.is_executed, error::invalid_state(EPROPOSAL_ALREADY_EXECUTED));Quorum Not Met Handling:
if (total_tally < proposal.quorum) { cosmos::fund_community_pool(&object_signer, uinit_metadata(), proposal.deposit_amount); proposal.is_executed = true; return false; }Proposal Rejection Handling:
if (no_count > yes_count) { return false; }Challenge Execution:
return challenge(proposal.stage, proposal.new_submitter, proposal.merkle_root, proposal.api_uri, proposal.snapshot_height);These checks cover various edge cases such as:
- Ensuring the proposal exists.
- Ensuring the voting period has ended or the quorum is met.
- Ensuring the proposal has not already been executed.
- Handling scenarios where the quorum is not met by refunding the deposit.
- Handling scenarios where the proposal is rejected by the majority.
Based on the provided code and the assertions present, it appears that the
execute_proposal_internalfunction is designed to handle key edge cases effectively. However, if there are additional specific edge cases or scenarios that need to be verified, further manual review or additional context would be required.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the edge case handling in `execute_proposal_internal`. # Test: Search for edge case handling patterns in other functions. Expect: Comprehensive handling of various scenarios. rg --type move $'assert!\\('Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the edge case handling in `execute_proposal_internal`. # Locate all Move files and search for `assert!` statements within them. fd -e move -x rg 'assert!\(' {}Length of output: 122816
354-438: Verify the logic for creating challenge proposals, especially the conditions under which a challenge can be made.Verification successful
The search results for
assert!statements are extensive and include many files unrelated to thecreate_challenge_proposalfunction. To focus on the relevant assertions within thecreate_challenge_proposalfunction, we should narrow down our search to the specific fileprecompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move.
The search results show several
assert!statements within theprecompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.movefile. These assertions are used to enforce various conditions, including permissions, existence checks, and state validations. Here are some key assertions related to thecreate_challenge_proposalfunction:
assert!(table::prepare<vector<u8>, WeightVote>(&mut iter), error::not_found(ESTAGE_NOT_FOUND));assert!(weight_vote.voting_end_time < timestamp, error::invalid_state(EVOTING_NOT_END));assert!(table::contains(&module_store.proposals, key), error::not_found(EPROPOSAL_NOT_FOUND));assert!(timestamp < proposal.voting_end_time, error::invalid_state(EVOTING_END));assert!(!proposal.is_executed, error::invalid_state(EPROPOSAL_ALREADY_EXECUTED));These assertions ensure that:
- The weight vote stage is found.
- The current weight vote has ended before proceeding.
- The proposal exists in the module store.
- The proposal's voting period has not ended.
- The proposal has not already been executed.
Based on these findings, the logic for creating challenge proposals appears to be well-guarded by these assertions, ensuring that the necessary conditions are met before a challenge proposal can be created.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conditions for creating challenge proposals. # Test: Search for the logic used in challenge proposal conditions. Expect: Specific conditions that allow for a challenge. rg --type move $'assert!\\('Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conditions for creating challenge proposals. # Test: Search for the logic used in challenge proposal conditions. Expect: Specific conditions that allow for a challenge. rg 'assert!\('Length of output: 248867
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conditions for creating challenge proposals in the specific file. # Test: Search for the logic used in challenge proposal conditions within the specific file. rg 'assert!\(' precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.moveLength of output: 3369
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (2)
184-213: Consider adding detailed documentation for theinitializefunction.The
initializefunction sets up the module store and initializes various parameters. It would be beneficial for maintainability and clarity to include comments explaining the purpose and effect of each parameter being set, especially for complex blockchain operations.
636-672: Consider using constants for magic numbers.The function
submit_merkle_root_internaluses several numeric values directly in the code. It would improve readability and maintainability to define these as constants at the beginning of the file.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1)
596-632: Improve input validation inchallenge.The
challengefunction modifies the state based on the outcome of a vote. It is critical to ensure that all inputs are validated to prevent issues. Consider adding checks to ensure that the inputs are within expected ranges.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move (1 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/vip.move (5 hunks)
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/object.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/object.move
Additional comments not posted (3)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/vip.move (3)
631-634: The implementation ofis_registeredfunction is correct and follows standard practices for accessing global storage and checking existence in a table.
1002-1011: Theupdate_vip_weightfunction has been changed to a friend function, restricting its use to friend modules only. This change enhances security by limiting who can call this function, aligning with best practices for sensitive operations like weight updates.
Line range hint
1-1011: The module is well-structured with clear separation of concerns among functions and data structures. The comprehensive use of specific error codes for assertions throughout the module enhances maintainability and debuggability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1)
185-214: Consider adding detailed comments to theinitializefunction to explain the purpose and effect of each parameter and assertion.Adding comments will improve code readability and maintainability, especially for complex initialization logic.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/vip.move (39 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/vip.move
* Fix/object max nesting (#56) * fix: increase count for maximum nesting check * precompile object * fix set_error (#57) * update shared libraries * update min/max logic (#53) * update min/max logic * validate vip weights * precompile * add view func for whitelisted bridge ids * fix object comment; named objects are deletable (#60) * fix: use roundup for fee calculation (#59) * use roundup for fee calculation * refactor to use function * fix bugs and update tvl logic (#58) * fix bugs and update tvl logic * fix typo --------- Co-authored-by: beer-1 <147697694+beer-1@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor --------- Co-authored-by: ALPAC-4 <81249838+ALPAC-4@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Harvey <saw151515@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1)
198-230: Consider adding documentation for theinitializefunction.It would be beneficial to include a brief comment describing the purpose and usage of the
initializefunction to improve code readability and maintainability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/vip.move (3 hunks)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/weight_vote.move (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/vip/vip.move (4)
26-26: The addition ofinitia_std::vip_weight_voteas a friend module is appropriate given the context of the PR, which involves voting mechanisms that likely need access to internal functions of thevipmodule.
657-660: The functionis_registeredcorrectly checks if a bridge is registered by querying thebridgestable. This is a straightforward and efficient implementation.
662-676: The functionupdate_vip_weights_for_friendis well-implemented with appropriate error handling for batch operations. The use ofassertto ensure the lengths ofbridge_idsandweightsare equal is crucial for preventing out-of-bounds errors. Additionally, the call tovalidate_vip_weightsat the end ensures that the total weight does not exceed allowed limits after updates, maintaining data integrity.
914-918: The public entry functionupdate_vip_weightssimplifies the interface for updating VIP weights by delegating to theupdate_vip_weights_for_friendfunction. This is a good use of function abstraction to keep the public API clean while reusing code.
add vip weight vote contract
weight vote
proposal
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor