Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add get_scores view function #175

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

feat: add get_scores view function #175

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

ALPAC-4
Copy link
Contributor

@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 commented Feb 10, 2025

Description

To support variable scores without state changes, the get_scores interface has been added. This allows the VIP agent to call the view function to retrieve scores instead of directly reading the table.

The L2 operator is permitted to modify the get_scores function, provided the following principles are followed:

  • The interface and ABI must not be changed: you can add or modify functions, but you cannot alter the existing interface or resources.
  • Once finalized, the score must not be changed.

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new user-accessible function for retrieving scores by stage.
    • Now offers configurable options to specify the number of score entries and a starting point for retrieval.
    • Implements an upper result limit of 1000 to ensure efficient and consistent performance.

@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 03:38
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the VIP score module by introducing a constant, two new structures, and a public view function. A constant MAX_LIMIT (set to 1000) is defined to restrict the number of scores processed. New structures—Score and GetScoresResponse—are added to encapsulate individual score entries and the overall response, respectively. Additionally, a new view function, get_scores, retrieves scores for a specified stage with parameters for limit and an optional starting address, enforcing the defined maximum limit during score collection.

Changes

File Change Summary
minitia_std.../vip/score.move - Added constant MAX_LIMIT (u16 = 1000)
- Added structures Score and GetScoresResponse
- Added public view function get_scores (parameters: stage, limit, start_after) that retrieves and filters scores

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant V as VIPScoreModule
    participant S as ModuleStore

    U ->> V: call get_scores(stage, limit, start_after)
    V ->> S: fetch scores for specified stage
    S -->> V: return score records
    V ->> V: enforce MAX_LIMIT and filter scores
    V -->> U: return GetScoresResponse with stage and scores
Loading

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, hopping through the code,
Finding new constants where the numbers explode.
With structures like carrots arranged in neat rows,
get_scores leads the way where the data flows.
My ears perk high for each line that's so bright,
In this vibrant garden of code, everything's just right!
Hop on, fellow coders, let's crunch bytes day and night!


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/vip/score.move (2)

177-211: Add documentation for the view function parameters and return value.

The function implementation is solid, but it lacks documentation explaining:

  • The meaning and valid ranges for the stage parameter
  • The purpose and behavior of the limit parameter
  • The role of the start_after parameter in pagination
  • The structure and interpretation of the return value

Add this documentation above the function:

+/// Returns a paginated list of scores for the specified stage.
+/// @param stage: The stage number to query scores for
+/// @param limit: Maximum number of scores to return (capped at MAX_LIMIT)
+/// @param start_after: Optional address to start pagination after (exclusive)
+/// @return GetScoresResponse containing the stage and vector of Score entries
 #[view]
 public fun get_scores(

196-201: Fix the hardcoded iterator direction.

The table iterator's direction parameter is hardcoded to 2. This should use a named constant for better readability and maintainability.

Consider adding a constant and using it:

+    const ASCENDING: u8 = 2;
+
     let iter = table::iter(
         &score.score,
         option::none(),
         start_after, // exclusive
-        2
+        ASCENDING
     );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f90d5dc and 906076e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/vip/score.move (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Rust libmovevm
🔇 Additional comments (1)
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/vip/score.move (1)

24-28: LGTM! Well-structured data model with appropriate limits.

The MAX_LIMIT constant and the new structs provide a clean interface for paginated score retrieval while preventing potential DoS attacks.

Also applies to: 167-175

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 906076e and 2c80e6d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/vip/score.move (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Rust libmovevm
🔇 Additional comments (3)
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/vip/score.move (3)

24-28: LGTM! The MAX_LIMIT constant is well-defined.

The constant value of 1000 is a reasonable limit for pagination to prevent excessive resource consumption.


167-175: LGTM! The response structs are well-designed.

The GetScoresResponse and Score structs provide a clean interface for returning paginated score data.


177-218: 🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing test cases that verify pagination
rg -A 5 "get_scores.*test" 

Length of output: 28

Copy link
Contributor

@djm07073 djm07073 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@beer-1 beer-1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 merged commit c639f88 into main Feb 10, 2025
3 checks passed
@ALPAC-4 ALPAC-4 deleted the feat/get-scores branch February 10, 2025 07:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants