perf: Fix SignModeEIP191Handler Initialization

[defitricks]

Description

SignModeEIP191Handler{} was creating a value without a pointer, even though SignModeEIP191Handler contains *aminojson.SignModeHandler. This made it incomplete without a pointer. Updated it to ensure proper initialization.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the variable declaration in tx/eip191.go. The change modifies the implementation of the signing.SignModeHandler interface by switching from an instance of SignModeEIP191Handler to a pointer to it. This adjustment ensures that the interface is now implemented with a pointer receiver instead of a value receiver. All other aspects of the code, including method implementations like Mode and GetSignBytes, remain unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
tx/eip191.go	Modified the variable declaration from a value instance (SignModeEIP191Handler{}) to a pointer (&SignModeEIP191Handler{}), ensuring correct interface usage.

Poem

I'm a bunny coding in the field of bytes,
Hopping over bugs with springtime delights.
A pointer now leads the way so clear,
Guiding interfaces without any fear.
With each new change, my ears do cheer!
CodeRabbit hops on, year after year!

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)

tx/eip191.go (1)

34-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use pointer receiver to avoid potential issues.

The GetSignBytes method accesses the pointer field SignModeHandler. Using a value receiver could lead to issues and unnecessary copying. Consider changing to a pointer receiver for better performance and consistency.

-func (h SignModeEIP191Handler) GetSignBytes(
+func (h *SignModeEIP191Handler) GetSignBytes(

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tx/eip191.go (1)

29-31: Consider using a pointer receiver for consistency.

While the Mode method doesn't access struct fields and works correctly with a value receiver, consider using a pointer receiver func (h *SignModeEIP191Handler) for consistency with the interface implementation and other methods.

-func (SignModeEIP191Handler) Mode() signingv1beta1.SignMode {
+func (h *SignModeEIP191Handler) Mode() signingv1beta1.SignMode {

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5cd97d and 2f7fcc8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tx/eip191.go (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tx/eip191.go (1)

26-26: LGTM! The pointer receiver is the correct choice here.

The change to use a pointer receiver for the interface check is appropriate since SignModeEIP191Handler contains a pointer field. This aligns with the initialization pattern in NewSignModeEIP191Handler and prevents issues with incomplete copies.