-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(docs): the link to the scan gave an error #344
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the URL in the README.md file for the InitiaScan multi-chain explorer. The modified link now points to a different domain and path, reflecting a change likely associated with a testnet environment or a new version update. No other modifications were made to the document. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
16-16
: Verify Updated URL and Consider Terminology ConsistencyThe updated URL for the InitiaScan link now correctly points to "https://scan.testnet.initia.xyz/initiation-2" as intended by the PR. However, note that a static analysis hint flagged a potential misspelling regarding the term "multi-chain." Some documentation styles prefer "multichain" as a single word. Please verify the preferred terminology for consistency across the docs.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~16-~16: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...can.testnet.initia.xyz/initiation-2): A multi-chain explorer with VM-specific tools and inf...(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CHAIN)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[misspelling] ~16-~16: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...can.testnet.initia.xyz/initiation-2): A multi-chain explorer with VM-specific tools and inf...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CHAIN)
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...