Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ci): introduce check-proto.yaml workflow #287

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 commented Jan 14, 2025

This workflow runs the protocgen.sh script via the Makefile and fails
if any files have changed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a GitHub Actions workflow to validate protocol buffer file generation
  • Changes
    • Removed nullable constraint for stakers field in StakersByOperator message

This workflow runs the `protocgen.sh` script via the Makefile and fails
if any files have changed
The `repeated string` type is never nullable
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate the checking of protocol buffer (proto) file generation. The workflow is designed to run on pull requests and pushes to key branches, executing a make proto-gen command and verifying that no unexpected changes occur during the generation process. Additionally, a minor modification was made to the StakersByOperator message in a proto file, removing the nullable constraint on the stakers field.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/check-proto.yaml New workflow added to automate proto file generation checks
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto Removed (gogoproto.nullable) = false option from stakers field

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant GHA as GitHub Actions
    participant Repo as Repository
    
    PR->>GHA: Trigger workflow
    GHA->>Repo: Checkout code
    GHA->>Repo: Run make proto-gen
    GHA->>Repo: Check for changes
    alt Changes detected
        GHA-->>PR: Workflow fails
    else No changes
        GHA-->>PR: Workflow passes
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Type: CI, Type: Build

Suggested reviewers

  • TimmyExogenous
  • trestinlsd
  • leonz789
  • bwhour

Poem

🐰 Proto files, oh proto files,
Dancing through our CI with flair,
Checking changes, line by line,
No unexpected surprises there!
Workflow magic, clean and bright! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/check-proto.yaml (2)

14-17: Consider reducing the timeout duration.

10 minutes seems excessive for proto generation. Consider reducing to 5 minutes as proto generation typically completes within a minute.

-    timeout-minutes: 10
+    timeout-minutes: 5

27-33: Enhance error reporting and CI performance.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Make the error message more actionable
  2. Add caching for proto tools
  3. Format the diff output for better readability
+      - name: Cache Proto Tools
+        uses: actions/cache@v3
+        with:
+          path: |
+            /usr/local/bin/protoc
+            /usr/local/bin/protoc-gen-go
+          key: ${{ runner.os }}-proto-tools-${{ hashFiles('Makefile') }}

       - name: Check if any files have changed post regeneration
         run: |
           if ! git diff --exit-code > /dev/null 2>&1; then
-            echo "Changes detected after running 'make proto-gen'."
+            echo "Error: Proto files are out of sync with their definitions."
+            echo "Please run 'make proto-gen' locally and commit the changes."
+            echo "Changes detected:"
-            git diff
+            git diff --color=always | sed 's/^/    /'
             exit 1
           fi
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59241ba and 958f56a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
  • x/dogfood/types/query.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
  • x/dogfood/types/query.pb.gw.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.gw.go
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/check-proto.yaml (1 hunks)
  • proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: test-unit-cover
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: run-lint
  • GitHub Check: goreleaser
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/check-proto.yaml (1)

1-13: LGTM! Well-configured workflow triggers and permissions.

The workflow is properly configured to run on relevant events (PRs and pushes to main branches) with appropriate minimal permissions.

proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (1)

45-45: Maintain consistency with nullable options.

The removal of [(gogoproto.nullable) = false] from the stakers field creates inconsistency with other repeated fields in this file. While this won't affect Go code generation for repeated fields, consider:

  1. Other similar fields like associations, delegation_states maintain the nullable option
  2. This might impact other language generators

Let's check for consistency across proto files:

-  repeated string stakers = 2;
+  repeated string stakers = 2 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false];

Copy link
Contributor

@TimmyExogenous TimmyExogenous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@bwhour bwhour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it looks good.

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 merged commit 4e54112 into imua-xyz:develop Jan 22, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants