-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upgrade actions/setup-go from v4 to v5 #286
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@leonz789 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request involves updating the GitHub Actions workflow configurations across multiple files in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
32-35
: LGTM! Consider standardizing version strategyThe version specification here (1.21 with check-latest: true) is appropriate for testing. Consider adopting this strategy across all workflows for consistency, unless specific workflows require pinned versions for reproducibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/ante-benchmark.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/build.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/dependencies.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/solidity-test.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/test.yml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: run-lint
- GitHub Check: goreleaser
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/ante-benchmark.yml (1)
30-33
: Consider removing check-latest when using a pinned versionThe workflow uses a pinned Go version (1.21.12) but also sets
check-latest: true
. This combination might lead to unexpected behavior ascheck-latest
could override the pinned version. Consider either:
- Removing
check-latest: true
to ensure consistent builds with the pinned version, or- Using only the major.minor version ('1.21') if you want the latest patch version
.github/workflows/solidity-test.yml (1)
20-23
: LGTM! Appropriate version specificationThe combination of Go version '1.21' with
check-latest: true
is appropriate as it will use the latest patch version of Go 1.21..github/workflows/build.yml (1)
23-26
: Maintain version consistency across workflowsThe workflow uses a pinned version (1.21.12) with
check-latest: true
, similar to ante-benchmark.yml. For consistency:
- Either standardize all workflows to use '1.21' with
check-latest: true
- Or remove
check-latest: true
and keep the pinned version 1.21.12This ensures predictable behavior across all workflows.
.github/workflows/dependencies.yml
Outdated
- uses: actions/setup-go@v5 | ||
with: | ||
go-version: '1.21.12' | ||
check-latest: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unnecessary setup-go action
The setup-go action can be safely removed as it's not being used:
- The dependency review is handled by
actions/dependency-review-action
- The Go vulnerability check is just an echo command
If you plan to keep it:
- Remove
check-latest: true
as it conflicts with the specific version - Consider removing the action entirely unless you plan to implement the commented
vulncheck
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify impact of setup-go v5 on dependency scanning
- The same version conflict exists (1.21.12 with check-latest: true)
- Since this workflow handles dependency scanning, verify that setup-go v5 doesn't affect the vulnerability checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any reported issues with setup-go v5 and dependency scanning
gh issue list --repo actions/setup-go --search "in:title v5 dependency" --json title,url
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete workflow file and its dependencies
cat .github/workflows/dependencies.yml
Length of output: 809
Description
Closes #XXX
Summary by CodeRabbit
actions/setup-go@v5
across multiple workflow files