Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expose semi-core modules via resolvers #479

Open
benmosher opened this issue Aug 8, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

expose semi-core modules via resolvers #479

benmosher opened this issue Aug 8, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@benmosher
Copy link
Member

clayne11/eslint-import-resolver-meteor#11

TL;DR: semi-magic modules (in this case, meteor/*) that exist on disk (and thus can be linted) but are baked into the environment (and thus, are not explicitly dependencies) ideally should not blow up no-extraneous-dependencies.

Hand-wavy possible solution: allow resolvers to define import types somehow. (maybe move the importType functionality down into the resolver spec?)

Or could keep the existing behavior when/if chosen resolver does not explicitly provide the designation.

@merlinstardust
Copy link

Any progress on this?

@jfmengels
Copy link
Collaborator

@merlinpatt No, no progress. If you feel like helping out, there could be some :)

@merlinstardust
Copy link

@jfmengels do you have suggestions on where to look to get started? I have 2 years dev experience but I've never written or contributed to a resolver before

@jfmengels
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for considering contributing! Unfortunately, that's a part I haven't touched either, and I don't want to send you on the wrong path.

@benmosher or @tleunen could probably advise you.

@benmosher
Copy link
Member Author

benmosher commented Oct 11, 2016

@merlinpatt I appreciate your enthusiasm! I am not sure this is a good place for a first contribution, though, as it's mostly an API change.

This is top of mind for me now that v2 is released, though, so I will be on it ASAP. 😁

@SrimalPriyanga
Copy link

Any progress to solve this issue?

@ljharb ljharb marked this as a duplicate of #605 Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants