Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 3: Clear-text logging of sensitive information #247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

icereed
Copy link
Owner

@icereed icereed commented Feb 17, 2025

Potential fix for https://github.com/icereed/paperless-gpt/security/code-scanning/3

To fix the problem, we should avoid logging sensitive information contained in HTTP headers. Instead of logging the entire headers, we can log only non-sensitive parts or obfuscate sensitive values. In this case, we will remove the logging of the headers entirely to ensure no sensitive information is exposed.

  • Remove the logging of req.Header in the logrus.Fields on line 97.
  • Ensure that the rest of the logging information remains intact to maintain the functionality of debugging non-sensitive parts.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated logging to remove HTTP request header details from debug output, streamlining the logs. Note that troubleshooting for HTTP requests via log analysis may now require alternative methods.

…nsitive information

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The change removes the logging of HTTP request headers in the Do method of the PaperlessClient struct. This modification, applied in paperless.go, means that the request headers will no longer be included in debug logs. No changes were made to the method signatures, error handling, or the control flow, and the public interface remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
paperless.go Removed logging of request headers in the Do method of the PaperlessClient.

Poem

Oh, what a hop—so light and free,
No more headers in our log tree.
Debugs now dance beneath the stars,
Without the clutter of HTTP scars.
I, the rabbit, cheer and play,
For cleaner logs come into the day!
🐇🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 992b3b8 and b6e5c53.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • paperless.go (0 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@icereed icereed marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2025 11:04
@icereed icereed merged commit b5fb1cb into main Feb 17, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant