You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A useR!2017 attendee asked after the implyr talk about what Impala's limitations for using DISTINCT were. Older versions of Impala (before version 2.0) allowed only one DISTINCT clause per query. Newer versions have removed this limitation. But the current version of Impala does have the limitation that you cannot use DISTINCT in more than one aggregation function in the same query. Write tests to check these behaviors in implyr, and document the practical implications of these limitations for implyr users who are using the distinct() verb or the unique() function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A useR!2017 attendee asked after the implyr talk about what Impala's limitations for using DISTINCT were. Older versions of Impala (before version 2.0) allowed only one DISTINCT clause per query. Newer versions have removed this limitation. But the current version of Impala does have the limitation that you cannot use DISTINCT in more than one aggregation function in the same query. Write tests to check these behaviors in implyr, and document the practical implications of these limitations for implyr users who are using the
distinct()
verb or theunique()
function.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: