Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concerns about Histogram Equalization #19

Open
lanpokn opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Concerns about Histogram Equalization #19

lanpokn opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@lanpokn
Copy link

lanpokn commented Oct 24, 2024

Greetings! This is an excellent work. However, I noticed an issue while using it.

The processing for low-light enhancement is different from other tasks, as it requires histogram equalization during reading, while other tasks do not. This seems to go against the original intention of a "blind all-in-one" approach, where we should not know the type of the input image, and therefore should not decide whether to perform histogram equalization.

May I ask if there would be any issues if we remove the histogram equalization operation for the low-light enhancement task, and train and test using a unified approach for all tasks? Or, based on testing, is histogram equalization necessary for low-light enhancement?

@zhengdian1
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, you are right. We really wanted to remove this histogram before submission, but due to time constraints, we couldn't adjust it, which is our regret. However, we believe that improving the noise schedule can solve this problem, and we also plan to expand it into a journal article and address this issue later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants