Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

Does the Pseudo-fusion filter discard chimeric reads completely? #11

Open
RaverJay opened this issue Oct 11, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Does the Pseudo-fusion filter discard chimeric reads completely? #11

RaverJay opened this issue Oct 11, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@RaverJay
Copy link

Hey,

see title.

Also, is it not feasible to split the read und process/keep both fused reads?

Cheers

@hyeshik
Copy link
Owner

hyeshik commented Oct 12, 2018

Hi,
You’re right. The filter does not try rescue the parts from the detected fusions.
We are currently working on improving the specificity of the detector to enable the feature you mentioned, but I expect that it would not be done in a mean time.

@RaverJay
Copy link
Author

Alright.
I was thinking that an experimental rescue mode might still be useful.
Straight up discarding them all bears the risk of losing long reads that are potentially vital for assembly.

Even without the improvements you mentioned - detection of the middle adapter already gives you the adapter position and even an inexact split could yield enough adapter signal to demultiplex. At the very least for the half without the internal adapter.

Anyway, thanks for your time and consideration!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants