Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix kernel tainted test #3818

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Fix kernel tainted test #3818

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

sairon
Copy link
Member

@sairon sairon commented Jan 21, 2025

I have only tested that it fails for unreleased 6.6.72 kernel but haven't tested the happy path and missed that it also failed because the types were different. Stupid me.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test_kernel_not_tainted function assertions in multiple test files to handle newline characters more precisely when checking kernel tainted status.

I have only tested that it fails for unreleased 6.6.72 kernel but haven't
tested the happy path and missed that it also failed because the types were
different. Stupid me.
@sairon sairon added the build Build and CI related issues label Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor modification to two test files related to kernel taint testing. In both test_basic.py and test_supervisor.py, the test_kernel_not_tainted function's assertion logic has been updated to handle newline characters differently. The changes involve modifying how the output is processed and compared, specifically removing the explicit newline character from the comparison.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/smoke_test/test_basic.py Updated assertion in test_kernel_not_tainted to join output and compare without explicit newline
tests/supervisor_test/test_supervisor.py Modified assertion logic to process output and compare without explicit newline character

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Function
    participant Command as System Command
    participant Assertion as Assertion Logic

    Test->>Command: Execute 'cat /proc/sys/kernel/tainted'
    Command-->>Test: Return output
    Test->>Assertion: Process output
    Assertion->>Assertion: Join output, remove newline
    Assertion->>Assertion: Compare with "0"
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the updated test flow, showing how the output is now processed to remove newline characters before comparison.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/smoke_test/test_basic.py (1)

86-86: LGTM! Consider adding test cases for non-zero taint values.

The fix correctly handles the output type from shell.run_check() by joining the list before comparison. This resolves the type mismatch issue.

Consider adding test cases that verify the error message when the kernel is tainted. This would help catch any future type-related issues early:

def test_kernel_tainted_error_message(shell, mocker):
    # Mock the shell.run_check to return a non-zero taint value
    mocker.patch.object(shell, 'run_check', return_value=['1'])
    with pytest.raises(AssertionError) as exc_info:
        test_kernel_not_tainted(shell)
    assert "Kernel tainted: ['1']" in str(exc_info.value)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48bf9b5 and 53623c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/smoke_test/test_basic.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/supervisor_test/test_supervisor.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/supervisor_test/test_supervisor.py (2)

200-200: LGTM! Consistent handling of shell output across test files.

The change aligns with the fix in test_basic.py, ensuring consistent handling of shell output in both test files.


Line range hint 86-86: Verify the fix works with different kernel versions.

Let's confirm that /proc/sys/kernel/tainted output format is consistent across kernel versions.

Also applies to: 200-200

✅ Verification successful

The fix correctly handles kernel taint file output format

The implementation in test_kernel_not_tainted is robust and will work reliably across different kernel versions because:

  • It properly handles both single-line and multi-line output formats
  • The kernel taint file format is standardized to output a single number
  • The string comparison with "0" works correctly regardless of trailing newlines
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check kernel taint file output format across different kernel versions
# Note: This helps verify that the fix will work reliably

# Check current kernel version
uname -r

# Check taint file format
cat /proc/sys/kernel/tainted

# Check if output contains only digits and newline
if ! grep -qE '^[0-9]+$' /proc/sys/kernel/tainted; then
    echo "Unexpected format in taint file"
    exit 1
fi

Length of output: 291


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the test file implementation and mocks
cat tests/supervisor_test/test_supervisor.py

Length of output: 8350

@@ -83,4 +83,4 @@ def test_kernel_not_tainted(shell):
"""Check if the kernel is not tainted - do it at the end of the
test suite to increase the chance of catching issues."""
output = shell.run_check("cat /proc/sys/kernel/tainted")
assert output == "0\n", f"Kernel tainted: {output}"
assert "\n".join(output) == "0", f"Kernel tainted: {output}"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't that fixing it on both sides? 🤔

How about:

Suggested change
assert "\n".join(output) == "0", f"Kernel tainted: {output}"
assert output.strip() == "0", f"Kernel tainted: {output}"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That won't work, the thing is the return type is a list of strings. This time I actually checked the test doesn't fail 🙈

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I see, and "\n".join(output) won't add a newline if there is only one element. Yeah make sense.

@sairon sairon merged commit 8233cb9 into dev Jan 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@sairon sairon deleted the fix-kernel-tainted-test branch January 21, 2025 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Build and CI related issues cla-signed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants