You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In core-plans, we have some package names which I feel are misleading.
boost159
postgresql11
postgresql93
For example, boost159, which is a pinned version of 1.59. A better folder name could be boost@1.59.
The idea is to use the pinned version reflect in the name of the package followed by @ sign. <name>@<major.minor.patch>
Below table shows some suggestions for the old and new folder names:
Old Name
New Name
bdwgc7
bdwgc@7
bdwgc8
bdwgc@8
boost159
boost@1.59
clang7
clang@7
corretto11
corretto@11
corretto8
corretto@8
curator4
curator@4
elasticsearch5
elasticsearch@5
ffmpeg3
ffmpeg@3
ffmpeg4
ffmpeg@4
ghc710-bootstrap
ghc-bootstrap@7.10
ghc710
ghc@7.10
ghc80
ghc@8.0
ghc82-bootstrap
ghc-bootstrap@8.2
ghc82
ghc@8.2
ghc84
ghc@8.4
ghc86
ghc@8.6
ghc88
ghc@8.8
gnupg2
gnupg@2
gradle4
gradle@4
gradle5
gradle@5
gtk2
gtk@2
haproxy16
haproxy@1.6
haproxy17
haproxy@1.7
haproxy18
haproxy@1.8
haproxy19
haproxy@1.9
haproxy20
haproxy@2.0
haproxy21
haproxy@2.1
icu52
icu@52
icu56
icu@56
kafka2
kafka@2
llvm7
llvm@7
logstash2
logstash@2
node10
node@10
node11
node@11
node12
node@12
node14
node@14
node6
node@6
openssl11
openssl@1.1
postgresql11-client
postgresql-client@11
postgresql12-client
postgresql-client@12
postgresql13-client
postgresql-client@13
postgresql93-client
postgresql-client@9.3
postgresql94-client
postgresql-client@9.4
postgresql95-client
postgresql-client@9.5
postgresql96-client
postgresql-client@9.6
prometheus1
prometheus@1
prometheus2
prometheus@2
python2
python@2
python34
python@3.4
python36
python@3.6
python37
python@3.7
python38
python@3.8
python39
python@3.9
redis3
redis@3
redis4
redis@4
ruby25
ruby@2.5
ruby26
ruby@2.6
ruby30
ruby@3.0
tomcat7
tomcat@7
tomcat8
tomcat@8
Currently, plan builder does not allow us to use any special characters in the package name. But changing the folder names still improves the clarity of the version of the package on a high level.
Note: This change does not require us to change the contents of the plan file. We only need to update the plan file path in the builder.
Follow a similar pattern for the packages in chef-base-plans org.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In core-plans, we have some package names which I feel are misleading.
For example, boost159, which is a pinned version of 1.59. A better folder name could be boost@1.59.
The idea is to use the pinned version reflect in the name of the package followed by @ sign.
<name>@<major.minor.patch>
Below table shows some suggestions for the old and new folder names:
Currently, plan builder does not allow us to use any special characters in the package name. But changing the folder names still improves the clarity of the version of the package on a high level.
Note: This change does not require us to change the contents of the plan file. We only need to update the plan file path in the builder.
Follow a similar pattern for the packages in chef-base-plans org.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: