Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lack of syntax for specifying intended discourse presupposition #55

Open
greenTara opened this issue Jul 21, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@greenTara
Copy link
Collaborator

The semantics introduces the notion of discourse presupposition as a way of "indexing" the entailment relation. However, there is no standard way to associate an intended discourse presupposition (e.g. single-universe) to a text (e.g. embedding this as a statement, or annotating the text through some wrapper)

@fabianneuhaus
Copy link

It seems to me that discourse presuppositions will normally be associated with a dialect. Thus, if we consider to annotate the text shouldn't we annotate it with the dialect as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants