You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The semantics introduces the notion of discourse presupposition as a way of "indexing" the entailment relation. However, there is no standard way to associate an intended discourse presupposition (e.g. single-universe) to a text (e.g. embedding this as a statement, or annotating the text through some wrapper)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems to me that discourse presuppositions will normally be associated with a dialect. Thus, if we consider to annotate the text shouldn't we annotate it with the dialect as well?
The semantics introduces the notion of discourse presupposition as a way of "indexing" the entailment relation. However, there is no standard way to associate an intended discourse presupposition (e.g. single-universe) to a text (e.g. embedding this as a statement, or annotating the text through some wrapper)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: