Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enforces order of transmitted messages #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2017

Conversation

colonelpanic8
Copy link
Contributor

This involved an absolutely massive refactor that completely changed the
interface. Things should be much more robust now.

Fixes #8 and #9

This involved an absolutely massive refactor that completely changed the
interface. Things should be much more robust now.
@grafov
Copy link
Owner

grafov commented Sep 23, 2015

@IvanMalison thank you for this contribution! I'll check it when I'll have some spare time.

@colonelpanic8
Copy link
Contributor Author

A better solution to the problem that this is trying to solve might be to use channel buffering.

The question then is what to do when a receiver channel buffer is full

@dvdplm
Copy link

dvdplm commented Jan 26, 2016

@grafov Any chance we can get this merged?

@dpc
Copy link

dpc commented Jun 10, 2016

I just hit that. I can confirm it's happening. Either this should be fixed, or documentation need to be very clear about this fact.

@grafov grafov self-assigned this Jun 10, 2016
@colonelpanic8
Copy link
Contributor Author

this should be merged.

@grafov
Copy link
Owner

grafov commented Mar 4, 2017

I agree with you but I forget about this project :( Sure, as it has stars and people try use it, let fix it.

@grafov grafov merged commit 15c6a67 into grafov:master Mar 4, 2017
@grafov
Copy link
Owner

grafov commented Mar 4, 2017

@IvanMalison many thanks for making this code usable! :)

@grafov grafov mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants