Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Deep CFR implementations to implement Policy #1243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

plamentotev
Copy link
Contributor

The player_id argument is not need, but still needs to be present in order to implement Policy. For example without it PolicyBot breaks as it passes three arguments (self, the game state and the player id).

The `player_id` argument is not need, but still needs to be present
in order to implement `Policy`. For example without it `PolicyBot`
breaks as it passes three arguments (self, the game state and the player id).
@lanctot
Copy link
Collaborator

lanctot commented Jul 1, 2024

Thanks!

I am off on vacation at the moment but will take a look when I get back.

(Note: the test failure seems unrelated.. cause by a backward incompatibility in numpy the we have to fix)

@lanctot
Copy link
Collaborator

lanctot commented Jul 3, 2024

Great, looking good! 👍

(The test failing is something we have to fix in our side.)

@lanctot lanctot added imported This PR has been imported and awaiting internal review. Please avoid any more local changes, thanks! merged internally The code is now submitted to our internal repo and will be merged in the next github sync. labels Jul 26, 2024
@lanctot lanctot merged commit 2eed8b6 into google-deepmind:master Jul 30, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
imported This PR has been imported and awaiting internal review. Please avoid any more local changes, thanks! merged internally The code is now submitted to our internal repo and will be merged in the next github sync.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants