-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create mercurial repository at Bitbucket #97
Comments
I'd be happy for you to work on integration: will help if I can. @catch22 I assume you're not opposed to a merge to core? There are some things I don't like about I don't have many long terms plans for this, other than try to fix bugs as we find them. I was thinking of reformatting the documentation to texinfo before next release. IIRC @catch22 wanted to refactor some of the code so if anything like that is happening, we maybe should coordinate. |
Would you like me to create a Octave hg repo at Bitbucket? (I have academic account) |
Hi guys -- I'll get back to you & the Octave ML before the end of the day. |
Can you guys quickly bring me up to speed what is the plan with regards to the hg repository? |
(this way we don't need commit access to octave) |
Oh, I understand - this is for eventually merging doctest into Octave core. Let's perhaps wait until the discussion on the octave-maintainers ML comes to a conclusion before taking any action (see also my email there from a couple of minutes ago). |
You are right, we should fix any rough edges before starting work on the integration task. Also doing the texinfo conversion and refactoring should be done first. |
This issue is probably contingent on #188. |
Soon Bitbucket won't be doing mercurial any more, so at least as titled, this issue is out-of-date. If someone wants to take another look at how we might merge into core Octave, that's of course welcome, but for now I'll close this. Feel free to re-open in the future. |
I have created a milestone for the integration project. We will probably manage particular tasks as issues here at Github.
I would really like to work on the integrating topic, so you could concentrate on new features for the Octave Forge package if you wish. @catch22, @cbm755, what are your plans?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: