Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create mercurial repository at Bitbucket #97

Closed
oheim opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Create mercurial repository at Bitbucket #97

oheim opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@oheim
Copy link
Collaborator

oheim commented Jul 9, 2015

I have created a milestone for the integration project. We will probably manage particular tasks as issues here at Github.

I would really like to work on the integrating topic, so you could concentrate on new features for the Octave Forge package if you wish. @catch22, @cbm755, what are your plans?

@oheim oheim added this to the Integration into GNU Octave core milestone Jul 9, 2015
@cbm755
Copy link
Collaborator

cbm755 commented Jul 9, 2015

I'd be happy for you to work on integration: will help if I can. @catch22 I assume you're not opposed to a merge to core?

There are some things I don't like about test() so a chance to fix those too! Off the top of my head: it goes into private/ dirs---not bad per se, but will need messing with PATH or CWD to work I think.

I don't have many long terms plans for this, other than try to fix bugs as we find them. I was thinking of reformatting the documentation to texinfo before next release.

IIRC @catch22 wanted to refactor some of the code so if anything like that is happening, we maybe should coordinate.

@cbm755
Copy link
Collaborator

cbm755 commented Jul 9, 2015

Would you like me to create a Octave hg repo at Bitbucket? (I have academic account)

@catch22
Copy link
Collaborator

catch22 commented Jul 9, 2015

Hi guys -- I'll get back to you & the Octave ML before the end of the day.

@catch22
Copy link
Collaborator

catch22 commented Jul 9, 2015

Can you guys quickly bring me up to speed what is the plan with regards to the hg repository?

@cbm755
Copy link
Collaborator

cbm755 commented Jul 9, 2015

  1. create clone of octave (not doctest)
  2. work doctest into that
  3. merge back to main octave hg repo

(this way we don't need commit access to octave)

@catch22
Copy link
Collaborator

catch22 commented Jul 9, 2015

Oh, I understand - this is for eventually merging doctest into Octave core. Let's perhaps wait until the discussion on the octave-maintainers ML comes to a conclusion before taking any action (see also my email there from a couple of minutes ago).

@oheim
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oheim commented Jul 9, 2015

You are right, we should fix any rough edges before starting work on the integration task. Also doing the texinfo conversion and refactoring should be done first.

@catch22
Copy link
Collaborator

catch22 commented Jan 24, 2019

This issue is probably contingent on #188.

@cbm755
Copy link
Collaborator

cbm755 commented Sep 11, 2019

Soon Bitbucket won't be doing mercurial any more, so at least as titled, this issue is out-of-date.

If someone wants to take another look at how we might merge into core Octave, that's of course welcome, but for now I'll close this. Feel free to re-open in the future.

@cbm755 cbm755 closed this as completed Sep 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants