Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show collection descriptor in search result - TETTRIS #180

Open
ManonGros opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Show collection descriptor in search result - TETTRIS #180

ManonGros opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ManonGros
Copy link
Collaborator

This is part of the feedback we received from the TETTRIS group.

They would like to be able to search/broswe collection descriptors directly. They originally suggested a separate tab for searching descriptors instead of collection.

Another solution could be to highlight the descriptor in the search result of the collection search.

@ManonGros ManonGros added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 21, 2024
@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

I like the idea to highlight the matching descriptors. Have they published any data we can test the ideas on? Or is this a theoretical exercise?

@ManonGros
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TETTRIS hasn't published data on GRSciColl yet but maybe they have some test data already. @wkmor1 Do you know if that's the case?

@wkmor1
Copy link

wkmor1 commented Nov 25, 2024

Yeah. I actually have an issue to do just that at our end, luomus/meta#96 I'll do my best to get this done this week before I go on leave!

@wkmor1
Copy link

wkmor1 commented Nov 28, 2024

Added a test reference collection here https://grscicoll.hp.gbif-uat.org/collection/fa50eda1-d031-4294-843c-b63fa5a88412

@ManonGros
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you @wkmor1, this is really helpful!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants