Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Feature Requests] Screenshot & S3 Buckets #21

Closed
random-robbie opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

[Feature Requests] Screenshot & S3 Buckets #21

random-robbie opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@random-robbie
Copy link

Hey Dude,

Can you add a screenshot system for when it hits pages that are responding with http so it can help work out what the pages are?

also on s3 buckets like this one..
Capture.png

can you have it so it grabs the bucketname?

view-source:http://js.mapbox.com/

shows Capture.png

which would be very handy to know it's on a s3 bucket and then i can check permissions of the bucket :)

@evilsocket
Copy link
Owner

I thought about screenshots, but if you think about it, they're quite pointless ... in order not to break the html layout, let's say I put the image as a small thumbnail on the right ... you have to click on it in order to see it ... so what's the difference of just clicking on a link and see for yourself what the page is? :D

Working on the Amazon thingy ;)

@ehsandeep
Copy link

ehsandeep commented Jul 13, 2017

@evilsocket, screenshot give us better idea to what loos 1st, handy in case of when u have like tons of subdomains, so you will better pick the target what u see, instead of clicking on every link!

so it will great add for sure, will request for that if you can reconsider about it.

@evilsocket
Copy link
Owner

@MadaraTech again, you'd have to click on each screenshot anyway.

@ehsandeep
Copy link

@evilsocket can't we see thumbnails or picture ? i mean we will click on what we see more understandable or easy to start the test, in other case, you will click on everything to see what application it is.

@evilsocket
Copy link
Owner

I'll write only once again ...

The only way to do this, would be putting screenshots in a new column on the table. But in order not to break the table, I'd need to set the screenshot size to a thumbnail, let's say 200x200 at most.

Now you have a bunch of 200x200 images which you have to click anyway since they're too small ... therefore, there'd be no difference between this and clicking on the links.

@ehsandeep
Copy link

hmm, UI conflict i see, that's understandable!

anyway in future, if you plan to update UI, consider this also in mind, it will good add in future!

Thanks for making it :)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants