feat: add remote attestation action #1885
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@odilitime fixed PR conflicts. This ready to go. I'm not sure what is going on with integration/smoke tests. |
shakkernerd
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relates to:
Closing #1796 in favor of this to avoid conflicts.
TEE Plugin and Adding Remote Attestations to be uploaded to a RA Explorer, so users can easily access an Agent's RA and verify on the proof.t16z.com explorer.
Risks
Low
Background
Add more verifiability to the Eliza TEE Agents
What does this PR do?
What kind of change is this?
Feature addition
Documentation changes needed?
Added to plugin-tee doc
Testing
Run TEE Simulator based on Eliza in TEE Docs then request a RA Quote
Where should a reviewer start?
Detailed testing steps
Ask on Discord for RA Quote:
proof . t16z .com
Logs:
