Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace codecov with python-coverage-comment. #90

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

MichaelRoytman
Copy link
Member

Description: The codecov action has been failing for a few weeks. This replaces the use of codecov with python-coverage-comment, which is the tool used in other private repositories.

JIRA: None.

Dependencies: None.

Merge deadline: None.

Installation instructions: None.

Testing instructions: None.

Reviewers:

  • tag reviewer
  • tag reviewer

Merge checklist:

  • All reviewers approved
  • CI build is green
  • Version bumped
  • Changelog record added
  • Documentation updated (not only docstrings)
  • Commits are squashed

Post merge:

  • Create a tag
  • Check new version is pushed to PyPI after tag-triggered build is
    finished.
  • Delete working branch (if not needed anymore)

Author concerns: List any concerns about this PR - inelegant
solutions, hacks, quick-and-dirty implementations, concerns about
migrations, etc.

The codecov action has been failing for a few weeks. This replaces the use of codecov with python-coverage-comment, which is the tool used in other private repositories.
@MichaelRoytman MichaelRoytman force-pushed the michaelroytman/new-coverage-flow branch from c28124b to 9894eb9 Compare April 19, 2024 18:15
Copy link

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

@zacharis278 zacharis278 merged commit f471fbb into main Apr 26, 2024
6 checks passed
@zacharis278 zacharis278 deleted the michaelroytman/new-coverage-flow branch April 26, 2024 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants