Issue 24 #29
Merged
Issue 24 #29
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add dictionary entries for "REAL", "DATE" and add "SIMPLE" data type
|
Thanks |
ebroecker
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2023
* support for DATE * fix typos #24 * Issue 24 (#29) * Add "REAL", "DATE" and "SIMPLE" data types Add dictionary entries for "REAL", "DATE" and add "SIMPLE" data type * Issue 24 - Support vor values without div tags (#31) * Add "REAL", "DATE" and "SIMPLE" data types Add dictionary entries for "REAL", "DATE" and add "SIMPLE" data type * Fix typo * Tabs to spaces * More tabs to spaces * add support for elements without div tag Co-authored-by: ebroecker <eduard@gmx.de>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@ebroecker You partly did the work; as @lojonas suggested I put the "REAL" and "DATE" also in the dicts and also added the "SIMPLE" datatype in the same way, which I did encounter in some documents.
Closes #24.