You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The difference between the Codekiller "Lazy Jones Fix" and the Swinkels one is so subtle- I can't figure out why Swinkels version has no problem with 180 music but Codekiller's does.
It looks like they do the exact same thing in almost the same way, to me. There must be a bug in the CK version...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is difficult to see how Codekiller's fix breaks something, since it doesn't do much more than adding a way for the SwinSID to detect wether a voice has been restarted within a single sample. This check adds a little overhead of course, maybe a SID song can exploit this by hammering the register multiple times, so the SwinSID runs out of CPU power. It sounds odd to me, but who know.
Now, these kind of issues are exactly why I am working on simulating the SwinSID firmware on a PC, so I can analyze this in a debugger. This will be more productive in the long run than starting to write new firmwares outright. I'll leave this issue open, so I am reminded that this is a problematic song.
The difference between the Codekiller "Lazy Jones Fix" and the Swinkels one is so subtle- I can't figure out why Swinkels version has no problem with 180 music but Codekiller's does.
It looks like they do the exact same thing in almost the same way, to me. There must be a bug in the CK version...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: