Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tuesday January 11 2022 Meeting #184

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

nkohen
Copy link
Contributor

@nkohen nkohen commented Jan 11, 2022

Please comment on this PR or DM with things we should discuss or other changes that should be made to this document.

Once the meeting has happened I will add meeting notes and then once they have been reviewed this will be merged into meetings directory.

@nkohen nkohen added the meeting label Jan 11, 2022

* [Numerical Decomposition Clarification](https://github.com/discreetlogcontracts/dlcspecs/pull/182)
* Needs Review
* Using `bigsize` vs. using `uintN`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a conversation I'd like to have for message representation in general. I think we could remove a lot of implementation vulnerabilities with better typing.

@Tibo-lg
Copy link
Member

Tibo-lg commented Jan 11, 2022

If time would like to discuss this: #168

* **#Query(Tibo)**
* **#Query(Jesse)**
* **#Query(Ben)**
* **#Query(Philipp)**
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately I won't be able to make it as I'm in Europe and the call will be at 1am for me.

Co-authored-by: Lloyd Fournier <LLFourn@users.noreply.github.com>
@nkohen nkohen merged commit 02a9b14 into discreetlogcontracts:master Feb 8, 2022
@nkohen nkohen deleted the meeting branch February 8, 2022 05:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants