You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
yucongalicechen
changed the title
feat: help users estimate capillary diameter / packing fraction to keep muD small
feat: lpp-getmud module that returns best mu or D for given muD
Mar 15, 2025
User has sample composition, energy, and mass density and a target muD in mind, and wants to check the diameter.
User provides this information labpdfproc.getmud (lpp.gm)
lpp returns the target diameter
UC2: {sjb: I doubt if this one will ever be used, but we could check with Till/Pascal?}
User has sample information, energy, target diameter and muD, and wants to know the sample mass density.
As UC1.2-3
User gets the target sample mass density.
UC3:
User specifies sample composition and energy.
As 2-3 in UC1.
User receives (multiple) recommendations for mu depending on phase
UC4:
as UC1 but user supplies packing fraction and no density
@sbillinge could you check if the UCs look good to you? Thanks. @yucongalicechen I simply edited these. I hope that is ok because it is probably hard to get back the earlier version....
sbillinge
changed the title
feat: lpp-getmud module that returns best mu or D for given muD
USE CASES:
May 2, 2025
Problem
Proposed solution
Implement this in a library format: return mu or D for given muD (we can reuse functions from computing theoretical muD).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: