Skip to content

USE CASES: #166

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Tracked by #145
yucongalicechen opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #175
Open
Tracked by #145

USE CASES: #166

yucongalicechen opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #175

Comments

@yucongalicechen
Copy link
Collaborator

yucongalicechen commented Feb 5, 2025

Problem

Proposed solution

Implement this in a library format: return mu or D for given muD (we can reuse functions from computing theoretical muD).

@yucongalicechen yucongalicechen added this to the 0.2.1 release milestone Feb 23, 2025
@yucongalicechen yucongalicechen changed the title feat: help users estimate capillary diameter / packing fraction to keep muD small feat: lpp-getmud module that returns best mu or D for given muD Mar 15, 2025
@yucongalicechen yucongalicechen linked a pull request Apr 25, 2025 that will close this issue
@yucongalicechen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yucongalicechen commented May 1, 2025

UC1:

  1. User has sample composition, energy, and mass density and a target muD in mind, and wants to check the diameter.
  2. User provides this information labpdfproc.getmud (lpp.gm)
  3. lpp returns the target diameter

UC2: {sjb: I doubt if this one will ever be used, but we could check with Till/Pascal?}

  1. User has sample information, energy, target diameter and muD, and wants to know the sample mass density.
  2. As UC1.2-3
  3. User gets the target sample mass density.

UC3:

  1. User specifies sample composition and energy.
  2. As 2-3 in UC1.
  3. User receives (multiple) recommendations for mu depending on phase

UC4:

  1. as UC1 but user supplies packing fraction and no density

@sbillinge could you check if the UCs look good to you? Thanks.
@yucongalicechen I simply edited these. I hope that is ok because it is probably hard to get back the earlier version....

@sbillinge sbillinge changed the title feat: lpp-getmud module that returns best mu or D for given muD USE CASES: May 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant