Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[controller] Add spec.lvm to a LocalStorageClass resource #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

ViktorKram
Copy link
Contributor

@ViktorKram ViktorKram commented Mar 4, 2024

Description

Added a new field for the LocalStorageClass resource's Spec named lvm.

Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?

New field provides better resource's structure.

What is the expected result?

Nothing special: everything should work the same way.

Checklist

  • The code is covered by unit tests.
  • e2e tests passed.
  • Documentation updated according to the changes.
  • Changes were tested in the Kubernetes cluster manually.

@ViktorKram ViktorKram self-assigned this Mar 4, 2024
@ViktorKram ViktorKram marked this pull request as draft March 4, 2024 11:37
@ViktorKram ViktorKram force-pushed the v-kramarenko-adds-lvm-field branch from a60ab54 to be6a704 Compare March 4, 2024 13:27
Signed-off-by: Viktor Kramarenko <viktor.kramarenko@flant.com>
@ViktorKram ViktorKram force-pushed the v-kramarenko-adds-lvm-field branch from be6a704 to 39ebe64 Compare March 4, 2024 16:13
@ViktorKram ViktorKram marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2024 16:13
@AleksZimin AleksZimin requested review from AleksZimin and dxavx March 4, 2024 19:30
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Zimin <alexandr.zimin@flant.com>
@ViktorKram ViktorKram added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 5, 2024
@ViktorKram ViktorKram merged commit 1382142 into main Mar 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@ViktorKram ViktorKram deleted the v-kramarenko-adds-lvm-field branch March 5, 2024 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants