Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add stronghold token #368

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Add stronghold token #368

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

mvasl
Copy link
Member

@mvasl mvasl commented Nov 22, 2024

Description

Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?

Why do we need it in the patch release (if we do)?

What is the expected result?

Checklist

  • The code is covered by unit tests.
  • e2e tests passed.
  • Documentation updated according to the changes.
  • Changes were tested in the Kubernetes cluster manually.

Changelog entries

section: <kebab-case of a module name> | <1st level dir in the repo>
type: fix | feature | chore
summary: <ONE-LINE of what effectively changes for a user>
impact: <what to expect for users, possibly MULTI-LINE>, required if impact_level is high ↓
impact_level: default | high | low

mvasl and others added 3 commits November 22, 2024 15:56
Signed-off-by: Maxim Vasilenko <5184586+mvasl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Vasilenko <5184586+mvasl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Vasilenko <5184586+mvasl@users.noreply.github.com>
@mvasl mvasl added this to the v1.64.0 milestone Nov 22, 2024
@mvasl mvasl self-assigned this Nov 22, 2024
@mvasl mvasl marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2024 12:59
@mvasl mvasl merged commit 4b22f4b into main Nov 22, 2024
34 of 36 checks passed
@mvasl mvasl deleted the add-stronghold-token branch November 22, 2024 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant