Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add timestamps to client events #51

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add timestamps to client events #51

wants to merge 12 commits into from
+77 −17

Conversation

aleortega
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13821703250

Details

  • 0 of 8 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.7%) to 45.055%
Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/metrics.ts 0 1 0.0%
src/controllers/handlers/forward-explorer-events.ts 0 7 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
src/controllers/handlers/forward-explorer-events.ts 1 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11798634277: -0.7%
Covered Lines: 207
Relevant Lines: 447
💛 - Coveralls

@aleortega aleortega force-pushed the feat/timestamps-in-client-events branch from e0209ca to fad7603 Compare March 12, 2025 15:23
@aleortega aleortega force-pushed the feat/timestamps-in-client-events branch from facc3d2 to eab5db0 Compare March 12, 2025 20:49
@aleortega aleortega force-pushed the feat/timestamps-in-client-events branch from eab5db0 to fbad248 Compare March 12, 2025 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@braianj braianj braianj approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@aleortega @coveralls @braianj