This document provides the information needed to contribute to Checkbox, its providers and its documentation.
Setup your editor of choice to run autopep8 on save. This helps keep everything passing flake8. The code doesn’t have to be pylint-clean, but running pylint on your code may inform you about issues that could come up later in the review process.
If you want to hack on Checkbox or its providers, one method is to install everything you need in a Python virtual environment.
Install the required tools:
$ sudo apt install git python3-virtualenv
Prepare the development environment. If you are an external contributor and plan on submitting some changes, you will have to fork the Checkbox repository first, and clone your own version locally. Otherwise:
$ cd ~
$ git clone git@github.com:canonical/checkbox.git
Create and activate the Python virtual environment:
$ cd ~/checkbox/checkbox-ng
$ ./mk-venv
$ . ~/checkbox-ng/venv/bin/activate
Activate the base providers in the virtual environment from within the virtual environment:
(venv) $ cd ~/checkbox/providers/resource/
(venv) $ ./manage.py develop -d $PROVIDERPATH
(venv) $ cd ~/checkbox/providers/base
(venv) $ ./manage.py develop -d $PROVIDERPATH
Install the Checkbox support library in the virtual environment:
(venv) $ cd ~/checkbox/checkbox-support
(venv) $ python3 -m pip install -e .
You should now be able to run checkbox, select a test plan and run it:
(venv) $ checkbox-cli
By default checkbox-cli
runs locally. If you want to run the remote version
you have to activate the checkbox-cli run-agent
on the Machine under test:
(venv) # checkbox-cli run-agent
Note: Keep in mind that run-agent has to be run as root and needs the virtual env, you may have to re-enable/activate it after a
sudo -s
Now you can run the control command to connect to it:
(venv) $ checkbox-cli control IP
Note:
run-agent
andcontrol
can both run on the same machine. in that situation, simply use127.0.0.1
Writing unit tests for your code is strongly recommended. For functions with an easily defined input and output, use doctest. For more complex units of code use the standard unittest library.
Ensure the job and test plan definitions follow the correct syntax using
the validate
command:
$ ./manage.py validate
Run checks for code quality of provider hosted scripts and any unit tests for providers:
$ ./manage.py test
In Checkbox we have a coverage requirement for new PRs. This is to ensure that new contributions do not add source paths that are not explored in testing and therefore easy to break down the line with any change.
To collect your coverage you can run the following:
$ python -m pip install coverage pytest pytest-cov
# cd to where your test is
$ python -m coverage run -m pytest .
Note that every part of this repository has a .coveragerc
file, they should
already include anything you may want to see in the report. If something is
missing you can edit it but please, consult with the team before doing so.
Tests are intentionally excluded from the coverage report, this is because
test files tend to inflate the coverage with no real benefit, so don't
worry if you can not spot yours in the report.
Of course, you may only be interested in the coverage of your patch (for
example, if you change a file that has a very low coverage, we do not want
you to take up the challenge of testing it all if you don't want to!). The
easiest way to get this measurement is to open a new PR and connect it with
your branch. The codecov.io
Bot should comment on it as soon as the tox
job relevant to your change is finished, giving you a handy report. Note
that the bot will tell you what you should improve to meet the requirements,
the constraints are listed in codecov.yaml
in the repo root.
Getting coverage right is not about having all lines in a source file executed. Coverage is more of a proxy measure of how much of your code behaviour does your test actually execute.
Consider the following:
def get_mod_status(a : int, b : int) -> str:
try:
if a % b == 0:
return "A is divisible by B"
return "A is not divisible by B"
except ZeroDivisionError:
return "B is 0"
except ValueError:
return "Unknown error"
To get 100% code coverage you may write the following tests:
def test_nominal_ok_0(): assert get_mod_status(10, 2) == "A is divisible by B"
def test_nominal_ok_1(): assert get_mod_status(10, 3) == "A is not divisible by B"
def test_error_0(): assert get_mod_status(10, 0) == "B is 0"
def test_error_1():
class error_mod:
def __mod__(self, other):
raise ValueError("Unknown error")
assert get_mod_status(error_mod(), 10) == "Unknown error"
This is not a very good test suite but we have reached 100% coverage. Notice
that most of the function above is easily tested by the first
three tests and covering the last two lines takes quite a lot of complexity.
This is already an indicator that it may not be worth covering them.
Now consider the fact that a % b
is equivalent to
a - (a // b * b)
so they are interchangeable, but if we swap them in the
implementation, the last test fails. What went wrong here is that to reach
100% coverage we are giving up on testing the functionality and we are
writing tests that mindlessly follow specific code path.
Wrapping up, while preparing the tests for your PR use the coverage as an handy metric to guide you toward thoroughly tested code. Do try to cover all important behaviour of your code but don't add a lot of mocks and/or complexity to squeeze out just a little bit more coverage.
In general, try to follow Chris Beams’ recommendations. In a nutshell:
- Limit the length of the title to 50 characters
- Begin title with a capital letter
- Use the imperative mode (your title should always be able to complete the sentence “If applied, this commit will...”)
Quoting again from Chris Beams’ article, use the body to explain what and why vs. how.
Example:
Run Shellcheck on bin dir scripts
The test command to manage.py currently looks for python unittests
in the provider tests/ directory. This change searches the bin/
directory for files with suffix .sh and automatically generates
a unittest that runs the shellcheck command on the file.
See the GitHub documentation for more information.
If the changes you provide affect different parts of the project, it is better to split them in different commits. This helps others when reviewing the changes, helps investigation later on if a problem is found and usually helps the original developer to better explain and organize his/her changes.
For example, if you add a new screen to the Checkbox text user interface (TUI) and then modify Checkbox internals to work with this new screen, it is good to have one commit for the new screen, and one for the internals changes.
Each commit should be stable, i.e. not introduce regressions or make tests fail. If two or more commits have to be used together, then they should become one commit.
Sometimes it is necessary to modify your changes (for instance after they have been reviewed by others). Instead of creating new commits with these new modifications, it is preferred to use Git features such as rebase to rework your existing commits.
Follow these steps to make a change to a Checkbox-related project.
-
Check the GitHub documentation on how to get started. If you are a Checkbox contributor, you can clone the Checkbox repository directly; if you are an external contributor, you will probably have to fork the repository first.
-
If you created a fork, you need to configure Git to sync your fork with the original repository.
-
Create a branch and switch to it to start working on your changes. You can use any branch name, but it is generally good to include the GitHub issue number it relates to as well as a quick explanation of what the branch is about:
$ git checkout -b 123456-invalid-session-content
-
Work on your changes, test them, iterate, commit your work.
-
Before sending your changes for review, make sure to rebase your work using the most up-to-date data from the main repository:
$ git checkout main # If you are a Checkbox contributor: $ git fetch origin # If you are an external contributor: $ git fetch upstream # Then, rebase your branch: $ git checkout 123456-invalid-session-content $ git rebase main First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: <your commits>
-
Push your changes to your GitHub repository.
Once enough people have reviewed and approved your work, it can be merged into the main branch of the main repository. Ask a member of the Checkbox team to do this. The branch should be then shortly automatically merged. The pull request status will then switch to “Merged”.
Checkbox documentation lives in the docs/
directory and is deployed on
Read the Docs. It is written using the reStructuredText format and built
using Sphinx.
The documentation should follow the style guide in use for documentation at Canonical. Please refer to it when proposing a change.
To install everything you need, go to the docs/
directory and type:
make install
This will create a virtual environment with all the tooling dedicated to output and validate the documentation.
To get a live preview of the documentation, you can then run:
make run
This will provide a link to a locally rendered version of the documentation that will be updated every time a file is modified.
Finally, you can validate your changes with:
make spelling # to make sure there is no typos
make linkcheck # to make sure there are no dead links
make woke # to check for non-inclusive language
Note: Please make sure you wrap the text at 80 characters for easier review of the source files.
Once all is good, you can submit your documentation change like any other changes using a pull request.