Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Needs explanation about the train and test results #19

Open
anwaar0 opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Needs explanation about the train and test results #19

anwaar0 opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@anwaar0
Copy link

anwaar0 commented Sep 14, 2023

Currently, I am using this library, I found these test results during testing for MNIST-USPS digit domain adaptation.

TEST RESULTS
{'Te_domain_acc': 0.29888888888888887,
'Te_source_acc': 0.9421212121212121,
'Te_target_acc': 0.1322222222222222,
'avg_test_loss': 1.5861893892288208,
'test_loss': 1.5861893892288208}

Can you explain the above short form of evaluation metrics? What I understood is
Te_domain_acc mean test domain accuracy
Te_source_acc mean test source accuracy
Te_target_acc mean test target accuracy
avg_test_loss mean average test loss
test_loss mean test loss

can you briefly describe the above, especially about Te_domain_acc in terms of MNIST-USPS?

Further, I also need a description of the table given below. I got this table after the completion of training.
method source acc target acc domain acc
CDAN 98.5% +- 0.25 90.1% +- 1.70 42.3% +- 2.63 (Validation)
CDAN 98.5% +- 0.24 90.6% +- 1.78 41.8% +- 2.56 (Test)
CDAN-E 98.6% +- 0.14 92.0% +- 0.79 33.8% +- 6.07 (Validation)
CDAN-E 98.6% +- 0.18 92.5% +- 1.34 34.0% +- 5.52 (Test)
DAN 98.8% +- 0.14 95.1% +- 0.58 nan% +- nan (Validation)
DAN 98.9% +- 0.13 95.5% +- 0.40 nan% +- nan (Test)
DANN 98.9% +- 0.19 93.1% +- 1.49 46.9% +- 18.23 (Validation)
DANN 98.9% +- 0.18 93.6% +- 0.89 46.3% +- 18.16 (Test)
JAN 98.6% +- 0.10 91.7% +- 0.97 nan% +- nan (Validation)
JAN 98.6% +- 0.17 91.7% +- 0.87 nan% +- nan (Test)
Source 98.9% +- 0.12 93.5% +- 1.41 72.4% +- 11.27 (Validation)
Source 98.9% +- 0.17 94.0% +- 0.75 71.6% +- 11.04 (Test)
WDGRL 97.2% +- 0.73 74.7% +- 7.56 54.9% +- 22.12 (Validation)
WDGRL 97.1% +- 0.74 73.7% +- 7.91 54.7% +- 21.84 (Test)

I understand that different methods are applied to source and target datasets. However, I still have a few questions,
Is this library using the pre-trained weights of MINIST (source)?
What is 42.3% +_2.63 in the domain ACC (first row and first column )?

I know, my issue may be general but it will be great if someone can provide information about these results.
Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant